The authors argue that attending to the affective dimensions of everyday life for Latino immigrant youth offers a disorientation away from the circulation of fear around immigration in the United States, and a new orientation that links together the intimate affective images and narratives of the everyday that are less oppressive and rooted in and branch out to hope and solidarity. To demonstrate the importance of the affective, the authors conducted a post-qualitative research inquiry interested in animating lifeworlds of seven Latino immigrant youth living in the context of North Carolina. The authors used process and nonrepresentational affect theories to analyze the data, tracing the rogue intensities and surface tensions of ordinary affects across and through the different students and their writing to highlight the students' fragments of experience as Latino youth in America today. Specifically, the authors drew on Ahmed's affect theory of sticky objects and sweaty concepts as they analyzed students' words against the discourse of fear and hate. In tracing the affects that circulate around three sticky objects-immigration, families, and America-the authors witnessed and experienced the moments of tension in students' affective lives. Doing this work with narratives of first-generation immigrants exposes the effect that embodied memories have on present-day experiences. The authors maintain that attunement to the affective realm produces a humanizing practice of literacy research and provides counteraffects of hope, gratitude, and life that speak to the more-thanrepresentational written narratives. Ordinary affects are public feelings that begin and end in broad circulation, but they're also the stuff that seemingly intimate lives are made of. (Stewart, 2007, p. 2) S ince the 2016 U.S. presidential election, hatred and fear have circulated and moved through the United States, treating immigration as an object of ordinary affect (Stewart, 2007) in that it has become ingrained in the everyday lives of U.S. citizens. In a quick internet search of immigration, borders, politics, and fear, hundreds of multimodal messages on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and news websites demonstrate a perceived threat and a residue of fear through terms such as invasion, safety, danger, and illegal aliens. This threat is echoed in messages of how immigrants might "hurt, " "burden, " "undermine, " and "strain" a nation. Often, the immigrants targeted by these public statements are silenced and hidden from view. The rhetoric makes their existence feel unwanted; thus, they are continually searching for a place in which they can belong. This rhetoric was echoed by