The Role of Empathy in Anger Arousal in Violent Offenders and University Students

Day, Andrew; Mohr, Philip; Howells, Kevin; Gerace, Adam; Lim, Loraine

doi:10.1177/0306624x11431061

Cited by 41 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Así, se afirma que la empatía depende del contexto o de la víctima y no es un rasgo estable (Day et al, 2011;Marshall et al, 2009;Martínez, Redondo, Pérez & García, 2008), y que realmente no es una variable que permita diferenciar agresores de grupos normativos ni que su tratamiento pueda reducir la reincidencia (Day et al, 2010;Huss & Ralston, 2008;Jolliffe & Farrington, 2004). Tal vez por eso, las tasas de psicopatía son más bajas de las esperadas en muestras de agresores encarcelados (Echeburúa & Fernández-Montalvo, 2007;Fernández-Montalvo & Echeburúa, 2008).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Sus déficits han sido identificados como un importante antecedente y facilitador de la conducta agresiva, mientras que su funcionamiento normal se contempla como un factor protector que inhibe la agresión y motiva al altruismo (Day, Casey & Gerace, 2010;Day, Mohr, Howells, Gerace & Lim, 2011;Jolliffe & Farrington, 2004, 2007Palmer, 2005). En este sentido, si un sujeto es capaz de empatizar y, por tanto, de experimentar las consecuencias de sus actos sobre los demás, será menos probable que dañe a otros y será más propenso a ayudarles (McPhedran, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Sin embargo, la respuesta empática no es igual en todos los sujetos ni en todas las situaciones y, en ocasiones, los distintos procesos y consecuencias de los mismos pueden derivar en una conducta violenta o de distanciamiento. Así pues, las diferencias individuales y situacionales explican por qué los déficits en empatía son Estilo afEctivo En agrEsorEs dE parEja dependientes del contexto o de la víctima más que un rasgo fijo (Day et al, 2011;Fernández-Pinto et al, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…La existencia de variabilidad entre sujetos violentos y la población general parece más clara en muestras de jóvenes que de adultos (Jolliffe & Farrington, 2004). Los resultados más recientes siguen siendo inconcluyentes a favor (Owen & Fox, 2011) o en contra (Day et al, 2011) del peso de la ausencia de empatía como variable explicativa del comportamiento violento.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Estilo de Apego, Empatía y Autoestima en Agresores de Pareja

Loinaz¹,

Echeburúa²,

Ullate³

2012

Ter Psicol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenFrecuentemente se señalan variables emocionales para describir el perfil de los agresores de pareja y para incorporarlas a los programas de tratamiento. El presente estudio compara las puntuaciones en apego adulto, empatía y autoestima de 90 agresores de pareja en prisión con un grupo de control de la población general (N=94). Ambas muestras fueron evaluadas con el Cuestionario de Apego Adulto, el Índice de Reactividad Interpersonal y la Escala de Autoestima. Los agresores fueron clasificados en dos conglomerados para valorar la posible existencia de un subtipo patológico y otro parecido a la población general. Los resultados no muestran diferencias significativas entre los grupos. Pese a no confirmarse las hipótesis predominantes a nivel académico, los resultados son congruentes con estudios recientes que señalan la ausencia de diferencias entre agresores y grupos normativos. Se discute el efecto de los instrumentos de evaluación en los resultados y su utilidad para las intervenciones.Palabras clave: Agresores de pareja, apego adulto, empatía, autoestima AbstractIt is common to refer emotional variables to describe the profile of partner-violent men as well as to include them in treatment programs. This study compares scores on adult attachment, empathy and self-esteem of 90 offenders in prison and a control group from the general population (N = 94). Both samples were assessed with the Adult Attachment Questionnaire, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The offenders were also classified into two clusters to assess the possible existence of a pathological subtype and other similar to the control group. The results show no significant differences between groups. Although the prevailing hypothesis in the academic context has not been confirmed, the results are consistent with recent studies that indicate no differences between aggressors and control groups. The effect of the assessment tools on the results and their usefulness for interventions are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Estilo de Apego, Empatía y Autoestima en Agresores de Pareja

Loinaz¹,

Echeburúa²,

Ullate³

2012

Ter Psicol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The role that perspective taking plays in social and personal relationships has been extensively examined in relation to the attributions we make for others' behaviour (Regan & Totten, 1975), helping (Batson, 1991), romantic relationship satisfaction (Davis & Oathout, 1987), and, more recently, anger, aggression, and anti-social behaviour (Day, Howells, Mohr, Gerace, & Lim, 2012). The ability to perspective take has also been associated with positive psychotherapeutic outcomes (Bohart, Elliott, Greenberg, & Watson, 2002), and is consistently identified as one of the foundations of a therapeutic relationship (Rogers, 1957).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Exploratory Investigation of the Process of Perspective Taking in Interpersonal Situations

et al. 2013

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ability to take the perspectives of others is considered a pre-requisite for effective interpersonal interaction. Despite extensive investigation into the correlates of perspective taking, there have been few previous attempts to understand the process by which people take another's psychological point of view. The purpose of this exploratory study was to identify the strategies used by individuals when attempting to take the perspective of another person.Twelve participants discussed a time they engaged in perspective taking. The analysis revealed that perspective taking was used in situations in which significant negative emotions could arise, and that participants shifted between the use of self-information (e.g., switching places, past experience) and other-information (e.g., target's personal characteristics) during the process of perspective taking. Different emotions and cognitions were associated with taking one's own perspective and taking that of the other person. The study provides a direct consideration of an under-investigated component of social and personal relationships.

show abstract

Dropout and recidivism are partly explained by emotional decoding and perspective taking deficits of intimate partner violence perpetrators

Romero‐Martínez

Lila

Sarrate-Costa

et al. 2022

Aggressive Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Professionals and researchers have dedicated important efforts to understanding the underlying factors that explain the failure to complete interventions (dropout) and the recidivism of men convicted of intimate partner violence (IPV) against their female partners. There is a growing interest in measuring emotional decoding and empathic deficits in IPV perpetrators to better understand dropout and recidivism proneness, due to their direct impact on behavioral regulation. In the current study, we first aimed to examine whether the emotional decoding abilities of facial expressions and empathic abilities (cognitive and emotional), as well as their interrelationships in IPV perpetrators (n = 561), would explain dropout, treatment attendance, and recidivism (risk and official) once treatment ended. Our results allowed us to conclude that emotional decoding abilities and perspective taking (cognitive empathy) were significantly and negatively associated with dropout and recidivism. Two moderation models were significant. On the one hand, participants with low emotional decoding abilities presented lower intervention doses the lower their perspective taking. Furthermore, the percentage of participants that reoffended was higher among individuals with low and moderate perspective taking who dropped out. Therefore, our study highlights the importance of conducting emotional decoding and empathic assessments during the initial stages of intervention programs to clearly outline the therapeutic needs of IPV perpetrators. This would allow designing coadjuvant and complementary training programs that can support the main interventions by increasing treatment adherence and, in turn, reducing the risk of recidivism.

show abstract

The Role of Empathy in Anger Arousal in Violent Offenders and University Students

Cited by 41 publications

References 37 publications

Estilo de Apego, Empatía y Autoestima en Agresores de Pareja

Estilo de Apego, Empatía y Autoestima en Agresores de Pareja

An Exploratory Investigation of the Process of Perspective Taking in Interpersonal Situations

Dropout and recidivism are partly explained by emotional decoding and perspective taking deficits of intimate partner violence perpetrators

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About