1971
DOI: 10.21236/ad0724632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Ethylene in Plant Growth and Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments with similar CO 2 treatments to our study found that black spruce responded to the elevated CO 2 conditions through increases in height growth, shoot mass and non-structural carbohydrates as well as decreases in stomatal conductance, leaf nitrogen content and SLA ( Tjoelker et al 1998 ; Bigras and Bertrand 2006 ). However, it should be noted that these experiments did not indicate that the CO 2 used to elevate the experimental CO 2 conditions had been scrubbed of ethylene—a plant growth hormone that can result in effects such as increased shoot elongation and diameter ( Abeles 1971 ), and it is a known contaminant in CO 2 cylinders ( Morison and Gifford 1984 ). There is also evidence to support no effect of CO 2 on physiological and morphological traits in previous studies ( Johnsen and Seiler 1996 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments with similar CO 2 treatments to our study found that black spruce responded to the elevated CO 2 conditions through increases in height growth, shoot mass and non-structural carbohydrates as well as decreases in stomatal conductance, leaf nitrogen content and SLA ( Tjoelker et al 1998 ; Bigras and Bertrand 2006 ). However, it should be noted that these experiments did not indicate that the CO 2 used to elevate the experimental CO 2 conditions had been scrubbed of ethylene—a plant growth hormone that can result in effects such as increased shoot elongation and diameter ( Abeles 1971 ), and it is a known contaminant in CO 2 cylinders ( Morison and Gifford 1984 ). There is also evidence to support no effect of CO 2 on physiological and morphological traits in previous studies ( Johnsen and Seiler 1996 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%