The role of EU cohesion policy in promoting smart and sustainable competitiveness in the regions of the Visegrad countries

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to analyse the competitiveness of the regions of the Visegrad countries (Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) with respect to their sustainability and discuss the role of the EU cohesion policy in promoting regional competitiveness in this dimension. Design/methodology/approach The sustainable competitiveness of Visegrad Group countries was analysed with the use of a taxonomic method, to determine the regions with the highest, middle and low level of the sustainable development (competitiveness). The level of sustainable competitiveness of the Visegrad regions was indicated based on the author’s own set of diagnostic variables which define three dimensions of sustainability. Findings The analysis revealed that the regions of the Visegrad Group countries with high GDP per capita are not necessarily ranked high in terms of sustainable competitiveness. The obtained results confirm the assumption that traditional indicators such as GDP per capita do not capture all aspects of social and environmental sustainability. Thus, the cohesion policy in the Visegrad Group countries should be diversified and adjusted to the special needs of the regions with particular emphasis being laid on sustainability dimension and the level of their economic development. When identifying the directions of support under the cohesion policy, special attention should be paid to the development of modern technologies, including information and communication technology (ICT), that facilitate the transformation of regions towards the smart regions path. Research limitations/implications Because of the data availability, it covers only one year, 2014, where it was possible. Further investigation should focus on the comparison of the changes over a certain period and changes that took place in the ranking. In addition, a detailed analysis of the regions with regard to their development of the “sustainable path” should be considered. It is essential to support less developed regions in the field of the sustainable and inclusive development through cohesion policy which is supported in 2014-2020. However, it is also important to promote the ICT investment in the lagging regions. Practical implications The analysed 35 regions of the Visegrad countries were ranked according to their level of sustainable competitiveness. The three groups of regions were distinguished. The first place in the ranking was occupied by the region which recorded the highest value of the TMC – a taxonomic measure of sustainable competitiveness and the last region – it is the region with the lowest value of the TMC. Originality/value The paper discusses the concept of sustainable competitiveness of regions. The level of sustainable competitiveness of the Visegrad regions was indicated based on the own set of diagnostic variables which define three dimensions of sustainability. The paper makes a contribution to the discussion on the regional smart and sustainable competitiveness and the role of EU cohesion policy in supporting the sustainable competitiveness.

Diffusion of blockchain in logistics and transportation industry: an analysis through the synthesis of academic and trade literature

“…The impact primarily focuses on both, reducing time and costs and increasing the profit margins of the transportation firms. The reason being, direct visibility and realization of impact by the firms against their efforts (Dziembala, 2018; Saberi et al , 2018). Although a lot of theory has been discussed in the academic literature, a few basic concepts have been adopted in the industry.…”

How Smart Are V4 Cities? Evidence from the Multidimensional Analysis

“…The analyses confirmed the specificity of these cities, which was one of the research questions presented in this study. Excessive disproportion between the capitals of states and other cities in the V4 countries may be constrained by the funds flowing in over the last dozen or so years, under the EU cohesion policy, intended to narrow the gap between average-developed and the least-developed regions of the European Community [87,[152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160]. In this case, regional capitals must find their own resources or funds from other operational programs, allocated specifically for the implementation of Smart and Sustainable City strategies [161].…”

The Enhancement of Sustainable Competitiveness of the CEE Regions at the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic Instability

“…The exposure and sensitivity to COVID-19 policy responses differ and, hence, the territorial impact of the pandemic varies [18] (pp. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. It is the result of policy responses timing and the length of lockdowns.…”

“…Nowadays, the concept of regional competitiveness, including sustainable competitiveness, is being discussed [1,2,5]. However, the novelty of this research is that it identifies factors that could reflect the dimensions of sustainable competitiveness in CEE regions and set their position.…”