The role of evaluation indicators in transport planning

Tyson, W J

doi:10.1080/03081067708717117

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

The Methodology Of Specifying Selection Criteria1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1986

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(These criteria are found in Fielding et al (1977), Heaton (1980), andTyson (1977).) The criterion, consistent with goals and objectives, refers to selecting performance indicators that measure the extent to which the operations of the public transit firm are impacting upon the specified goals and objectives related to transit service.…”

Section: The Methodology Of Specifying Selection Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of two methodologies for selecting transit performance indicators

Talley

1986

Transportation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two contrasting methodologies have appeared in the literature for selecting indicators to evaluate the performance of public transit firms. One methodology specifies the criteria that the selected performance indicators must satisfy. The other methodology requires the specification of operating objectives by the transit firm for the purpose of then selecting performance indicators. This paper compares the two methodologies and discusses the attributes of one methodology versus those of the other methodology. Also, a major difference in the premises of the two methodologies is demonstrated.

show abstract

Section: The Methodology Of Specifying Selection Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%