1987
DOI: 10.1287/opre.35.2.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of External Search in Bilateral Bargaining

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At first glance one can find such a comparative static in Chikte and Deshmukh (1987). This and subsequent models in this subsection focus on both parties' uncertainty about willingness to pay that arises from uncertain outside options (there is no incomplete information about search cost or bargaining disutility).…”
Section: Search Costs and Buyer Information About Her/his Own Outsidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At first glance one can find such a comparative static in Chikte and Deshmukh (1987). This and subsequent models in this subsection focus on both parties' uncertainty about willingness to pay that arises from uncertain outside options (there is no incomplete information about search cost or bargaining disutility).…”
Section: Search Costs and Buyer Information About Her/his Own Outsidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 This problem has motivated the papers by Lee (1994) and Chatterjee and Lee (1998), who, in fact, use car buying as their motivating example. Both models have a similar setup as Chikte and Deshmukh (1987); however, they allow buyers to hold on to the outside offers they have received throughout the entire bargaining process. The models in Lee (1994) and Chatterjee and Lee (1998) differ in that the former paper assumes that outside offers to the buyer are known to both the buyer and the seller, whereas the latter assumes that such offers are private information of the buyer (i.e., that the buyer cannot credibly convey to the seller what the outside offer is).…”
Section: Search Costs and Buyer Information About Her/his Own Outsidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Reservation prices and wages are often captured by the exponential distribution. For example, see Perloff and Salop (1985), Hendricks, Porter, and Wilson (1994), Trajtenberg (1989), Chikte and Deshmukh (1987), Anderson, de Palma, and Hong (1992), Evans (1985), Xie and Sirbu (1995), Bolton (1989). Table 1 Monopoly profits for spot and advance selling (ck b 1)…”
Section: Advance Sellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, we show that the Coasian phenomenon can exist even when all negotiations are publicly observable. Finally, there are several other papers on searching for outside options, for example, Chikte and Deshmukh ( [12]), Muthoo ([26]), Lee ([24]), Chatterjee and Lee ([11]) (This has private information about outside options). We do not discuss these in detail because they are not directly comparable to our work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%