2016
DOI: 10.12711/tjbe.2016.9.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Fair Trade Trust on the Relationship of Fair Trade Knowledge, Fair Trade Adhesion, and Willingness to Pay Fair Trade Premium: The Case of Turkey

Abstract: Nowadays, the increase of competition has made it difficult for small-scale producers and farmers to carry on their activities in the face of big business. These challenges have started to bring significance to fair trade, which aims to bring more equal footing to trade. This study investigates the impacts of fair trade knowledge on fair trade adhesion and on willingness to pay its premium cost, and the effect of a sense of trust in fair trade on these impacts. The study' s first model examines the relationshi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Millennials" trust in Fairtrade products increases product involvement and the belief in them being safer, more ethical, and more sustainable than non-Fairtrade products, and this situation justify the higher price. These findings appear to echo previous research results on product involvement (Alexander & Nicholls, 2006;Pedregal & Ozcaglar-Toulouse, 2011;Davenport & Low, 2013) and WTP a premium (Krystallis & Chryssohoidis, 2005;Pedragal & Ozcaglar-Touluse, 2011;Langen & Adenauer, 2013;Kapusuz & Kimzan, 2016;Habibov et al, 2017). The following hypotheses are thus accepted -H 2a , H 2b .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, Millennials" trust in Fairtrade products increases product involvement and the belief in them being safer, more ethical, and more sustainable than non-Fairtrade products, and this situation justify the higher price. These findings appear to echo previous research results on product involvement (Alexander & Nicholls, 2006;Pedregal & Ozcaglar-Toulouse, 2011;Davenport & Low, 2013) and WTP a premium (Krystallis & Chryssohoidis, 2005;Pedragal & Ozcaglar-Touluse, 2011;Langen & Adenauer, 2013;Kapusuz & Kimzan, 2016;Habibov et al, 2017). The following hypotheses are thus accepted -H 2a , H 2b .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Attitude generation theories such as the reasoned action theory (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975) and the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991) support this research for identifying environmentally sensitive purchasing behavior. Individuals who have information about ethical consumption and fair trade are more sensitive to purchasing fair trade products with an environmentally responsible way (Kapusuz and Kimzan, 2016). The duration of green consumerism is; buying and non-buying decisions of users, based on the sustainable and environmental measure (Sharma and Dayal, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly noteworthy is the brand equity dimension of PP, which showed the greatest influence on PI. PP refers to consumption perception of consumers who are willing to help developing countries or pay a price premium on intangible value (EC, 2010;Kapusuz & Kimzan, 2016;Mai, 2014;Park, 2018a). Unlike the traditional buying behavior of buying the best quality products at a lowest price, consumer intentions of willingness to pay price premiums will play a positive role in making the ecosystem of small FT companies sustainable.…”
Section: Industry Contributions and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%