2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-07039-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of financial development, energy demand, and technological change in environmental sustainability agenda: evidence from selected Asian countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
68
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
6
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Umar et al (2020) examine the long-run and causal effects of financial development on CO emissions in China using the combined co-integration and wavelet coherence approaches over the period 1971 to 2018; they discover that in the long run, there are negative correlations between CO 2 emissions and financial development for the case of China. Furthermore, Paramati et al (2017), Renzhi and Baek (2020), Saleem et al (2020), Shahbaz et al (2013b), and Zhao and Yang (2020) report the same results for the financial development-carbon emissions nexus, indicating that the effect of financial development on CO 2 emissions is negative. The second strand of literature suggests a positive effect of financial development on CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Umar et al (2020) examine the long-run and causal effects of financial development on CO emissions in China using the combined co-integration and wavelet coherence approaches over the period 1971 to 2018; they discover that in the long run, there are negative correlations between CO 2 emissions and financial development for the case of China. Furthermore, Paramati et al (2017), Renzhi and Baek (2020), Saleem et al (2020), Shahbaz et al (2013b), and Zhao and Yang (2020) report the same results for the financial development-carbon emissions nexus, indicating that the effect of financial development on CO 2 emissions is negative. The second strand of literature suggests a positive effect of financial development on CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…First, scholars who have explored the impact of financial development on CO 2 emissions at the country level include Abbasi and Riaz (2016) and Shahbaz et al (2016) for Pakistan; Ali et al (2017) and Shahbaz et al (2013b) for Malaysia; Boutabba (2014) and Sehrawat et al (2015) for India; Moghadam and Dehbashi (2018) for Iran; Ozturk and Acaravci (2013) for Turkey; Shahbaz et al (2018) for France; Shahbaz et al (2013a) for Indonesia; and Ahmad et al (2018), Lahiani (2020), Umar et al (2020), Qi (2018), Yin et al (2019), Zhao and Yang (2020), and Zhang (2011) for China. For cross-country case studies, Paramati et al (2017) analyze the role of financial development in CO 2 emissions for the case of G20 countries; similar studies at the regional level have been conducted by Abdouli and Hammami (2020) for Middle East countries; Acheampong (2019) for 46 sub-Saharan Africa countries; Adams and Klobodu (2018) for 26 African countries; Charfeddine and Khediri (2016) and Shahbaz et al (2020) for the United Arab Emirates (i.e., a federation of seven emirates, including Abu Dhabi, Ajman, Dubai, Fujairah, Ras-al-Khaimah, Sharjah, and Ummal-Quwain); Koengkan et al (2019) for Latin American and Caribbean countries; Le et al (2020) for 31 Asian countries; Saleem et al (2020) for selected Asian countries; Seetanah et al (2019) for 12 selected small island developing states; Wang et al (2020a) for G-7 countries; Wang et al (2020b) for N-11 countries; Shoaib et al (2020) for eight developing countries (D8) and eight developed countries (G8); Tamazian et al (2009) for BRIC countries (i.e. Brazil, Russia, India, and China); and Ziaei (2015) for European, East Asian, and Oceania countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using several econometric methods, they verified both the EKC and renewable energy Kuznets Curve (RKC) hypotheses, indicating that a 10% rise in RER would lead to a 1.6% carbon emission reduction. Saleem et al [27] used the data for a period of 1980-2015 from selected Asian countries and employing several econometrics models, found the presence of an EKC hypothesis, where the impact of GDP growth and the square of GDP growth on CO 2 emissions are positive and negative, respectively. They also found that lower-income economies do not support the EKC hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research that investigates specifically the connection between technological innovation and the EF is not common. By taking carbon emissions as the main environmental measure, most research has centered on the effect of technological change on environmental quality [20][21][22][23][24]. The following mathematical model is set out in Eq.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also a variety of generic studies that discussed the environmental quality implications of technology and innovation [17][18][19]. There is limited evidence of the use of innovation and research and development as a combination of technological effects in measuring their influence on environmental quality [20][21][22][23][24]. To the best of our knowledge there is a very little indication that technology-environmental link has been incorporated in a single analysis using EF as a measure of environmental quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%