Abstract:BACKGROUND
Scalp melanoma is aggressive and has a proclivity for regional metastasis. We hypothesize that subperiosteal scalp melanoma resection reduces in-transit/satellite recurrence, when compared to subgaleal resection.
METHODS
We identified patients with intermediate to deep, primary scalp melanoma referred to head/neck surgery over an eight-year period. Patients were compared based on scalp resection depth, including subperiosteal (resection to the level of calvarium) and subgaleal (resection including… Show more
Background:Large complex scalp wounds that have traditionally required free vascularized tissue transfer have been successfully reconstructed with skin substitutes such as Integra. Although there are multiple reports of Integra-based reconstructions of scalp wounds, there has not been a comprehensive assessment of this body of literature that critically examines this method. Our goal was to conduct a systematic review to determine the effectiveness of Integra-based reconstructions of scalp wounds, with emphasis on large defects.Methods:A comprehensive systematic review was completed using key search terms, including Integra, dermal regeneration template, bovine collagen, skin substitute, forehead, and scalp. Selected articles reported characteristics of patients and their reconstructions. The primary outcome measures were wound complications and percent graft take.Results:Thirty-four articles were included in this systematic review. Wound sizes ranged from 5.7 to 610 cm2, with 35.3% of articles reporting a mean defect size >100 cm2. Thirty-two articles reported mean percent take of skin graft ≥90%. Sixteen articles reported a minor complication. There were no major complications associated with the reconstructions.Conclusions:There is a substantial evidence base for the use of Integra to reconstruct scalp wounds. To date, the dermal regeneration template is generally reserved for salvage procedures or when the patient cannot tolerate free tissue transfer. Based on the findings of this systematic review and the authors’ clinical experience, Integra can be used to achieve predictable results in large complex scalp defects.
Background:Large complex scalp wounds that have traditionally required free vascularized tissue transfer have been successfully reconstructed with skin substitutes such as Integra. Although there are multiple reports of Integra-based reconstructions of scalp wounds, there has not been a comprehensive assessment of this body of literature that critically examines this method. Our goal was to conduct a systematic review to determine the effectiveness of Integra-based reconstructions of scalp wounds, with emphasis on large defects.Methods:A comprehensive systematic review was completed using key search terms, including Integra, dermal regeneration template, bovine collagen, skin substitute, forehead, and scalp. Selected articles reported characteristics of patients and their reconstructions. The primary outcome measures were wound complications and percent graft take.Results:Thirty-four articles were included in this systematic review. Wound sizes ranged from 5.7 to 610 cm2, with 35.3% of articles reporting a mean defect size >100 cm2. Thirty-two articles reported mean percent take of skin graft ≥90%. Sixteen articles reported a minor complication. There were no major complications associated with the reconstructions.Conclusions:There is a substantial evidence base for the use of Integra to reconstruct scalp wounds. To date, the dermal regeneration template is generally reserved for salvage procedures or when the patient cannot tolerate free tissue transfer. Based on the findings of this systematic review and the authors’ clinical experience, Integra can be used to achieve predictable results in large complex scalp defects.
“…This method of excision also conveniently permits direct skin grafting to the periosteum and aside from several patients reported in this cohort, a sub‐galeal resection is our routine practice. The role of a deeper resection plane in the scalp has been raised as a potential reason for worse loco‐regional control after a WLE for scalp melanoma . The study by Pannucci et al, although limited in sample size ( n = 36), found a significantly worse rate of local metastases on univariate analysis for a sub‐galeal resection plane as compared with the sub‐periosteal plane for patients with primary scalp melanoma (26.3% vs. 0%; P = 0.047).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published series and registries integrate the outcomes of scalp melanoma with other anatomical sites, particularly the neck . To date, there are three analyses focusing on the patterns of recurrence for primary cutaneous scalp melanoma in the literature . Recent work by Pannucci and co‐workers suggested a potential advantage in local scalp control by performing a sub‐periosteal resection of the primary lesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,7 To date, there are three analyses focusing on the patterns of recurrence for primary cutaneous scalp melanoma in the literature. [8][9][10] Recent work by Pannucci and co-workers 10 suggested a potential advantage in local scalp control by performing a sub-periosteal resection of the primary lesion. There have been no other studies in the literature related to depth of resection, anatomical planes of resection, surgical margin, or the role of reconstructive methods to obtain optimal results for primary scalp melanoma.…”
Our results support the hypothesis that primary scalp melanoma represents a unique aggressive subcategory with high rates of in-transit disease and poor disease-related and survival outcomes. There is a need for robust prospective comparative studies to address the significance of resection plane in the management of patients with scalp melanoma.
“…One series demonstrated subperiosteal resection to decrease in-transit recurrence in node-negative primary scalp melanomas compared to subgaleal resection. 126 Melanomas overlying the parotid gland should be excised down to the parotid fascia; parotidectomy is indicated if melanoma involves the superficial parotid fascia.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.