2017
DOI: 10.1080/0966369x.2017.1383363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of gender norms in access to agricultural training in Chikwawa and Phalombe, Malawi

Abstract: Based on qualitative research conducted in Chikwawa and Phalombe in Malawi, this article discusses how gender relations shape men and women's access to and participation in agricultural training. It also examines how men and women justify or challenge gender inequalities in relation to access to agricultural information and knowledge. Data on gender and recruitment to and participation in training, barriers to training and access to information as well as farmer to farmer extension models were collected and an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The under-representation of women within this study (see Table 1) supports the findings of Mudege et al (50) and Valette (6), where the common perception of men as household heads and women as illiterate helpers within the household, reproduces this gender bias, denying women access to information and training, and making women less willing to share their voice. Social influence seems to direct resources most commonly to men as they are considered the primary carers for the donkeys.…”
Section: Social Status and Gendersupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The under-representation of women within this study (see Table 1) supports the findings of Mudege et al (50) and Valette (6), where the common perception of men as household heads and women as illiterate helpers within the household, reproduces this gender bias, denying women access to information and training, and making women less willing to share their voice. Social influence seems to direct resources most commonly to men as they are considered the primary carers for the donkeys.…”
Section: Social Status and Gendersupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This aligns with data from our survey which show that women were significantly more likely to be pragmatists, as seen by high responses to the openness to change question in the survey (i.e., they chose the option ''I am interested in what other farmers do but if it suits me, I will do things differently to other farmers."). These results echo the uneven power relations that are associated with traditional gender roles in agriculture in many parts of the world such as Africa and Eastern Europe, where men maintain power and control over the farming activities whilst women's contributions are primarily with housework [64]. Women's agricultural contributions tend more be seen as 'just helping' and therefore become under-valued, and where they instead usually undertake time-consuming labour such as weeding and planting rather than male tasks such as using machinery or ploughing fields (this was often observed during the project fieldwork).…”
Section: Gender-related Differences In the Embrace Of New Practicesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Gender effects on agricultural productivity and technology adoption has been extensively studied (Udry, 1995;Lubwama, 1999;Doss and Morris, 2000;Doss, 2001;Peterman et al, 2011;Ragasa, 2012;Ndiritu et al, 2012;Croppenstedt et al, 2013;Kilic et al, 2013;Mukasa and Salami, 2015;Murage et al, 2015;Ali et al, 2016;Mudege et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%