Molecular adaptation is typically assumed to proceed by sequential fixation of beneficial mutations. In diploids, this picture presupposes that for most adaptive mutations, the homozygotes have a higher fitness than the heterozygotes. Here, we show that contrary to this expectation, a substantial proportion of adaptive mutations should display heterozygote advantage. This feature of adaptation in diploids emerges naturally from the primary importance of the fitness of heterozygotes for the invasion of new adaptive mutations. We formalize this result in the framework of Fisher's influential geometric model of adaptation. We find that in diploids, adaptation should often proceed through a succession of short-lived balanced states that maintain substantially higher levels of phenotypic and fitness variation in the population compared with classic adaptive walks. In fast-changing environments, this variation produces a diversity advantage that allows diploids to remain better adapted compared with haploids despite the disadvantage associated with the presence of unfit homozygotes. The short-lived balanced states arising during adaptive walks should be mostly invisible to current scans for long-term balancing selection. Instead, they should leave signatures of incomplete selective sweeps, which do appear to be common in many species. Our results also raise the possibility that balancing selection, as a natural consequence of frequent adaptation, might play a more prominent role among the forces maintaining genetic variation than is commonly recognized.A daptation by natural selection is the key process responsible for the fit between organisms and their environments. The invasion of new adaptive mutations is an essential component of this process that fundamentally differs between haploid and diploid populations. In diploids, while a new mutation is still rare, natural selection acts primarily on the mutant heterozygote (1). As a result, only those adaptive mutations that confer a fitness advantage as heterozygotes have an appreciable chance of invading the population ("Haldane's sieve"). However, if the heterozygote of an invading adaptive mutation is fitter than the mutant homozygote, the mutation will not be driven to fixation but, instead, maintained at an intermediate, balanced frequency.We argue that heterozygote advantage should be very common during adaptation in diploids if selection is stabilizing and at least some mutations are large enough to overshoot the optimum. Consider, for example, adaptation through changes in gene expression (Fig. 1A), which is an important, if not the dominant, mechanism of adaptation (2). Here, mutations of small effect (Fig. 1B) will be adaptive when they modify expression in the adaptive direction whether the organism is haploid or diploid. However, mutations of large effect (Fig. 1C) can be nonadaptive in haploids, because they overshoot the optimum, yet be adaptive in diploids, because their phenotypic effect is moderated when heterozygous. These mutations will have heterozy...