2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Gesture in Communication and Cognition: Implications for Understanding and Treating Neurogenic Communication Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 257 publications
(350 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there is a positive perception when someone uses hand movements. For cognitive processing, some studies have shown that these gestures can improve understanding and comprehension (Graham and Argyle, 1975;Riseborough, 1981;Hostetter, 2011;Kelly et al, 2015;Dargue et al, 2019), attention (Berger and Popelka, 1971), memory (Ianì and Bucciarelli, 2017;Clough and Duff, 2020), stimulate emotional reactions (Jackob et al, 2011), and clarify the discourse content (Holle and Gunter, 2007). According to the integrated system hypothesis (Kelly et al, 2010), gestures are part of an integrated system together with speech.…”
Section: Hand Gesturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a positive perception when someone uses hand movements. For cognitive processing, some studies have shown that these gestures can improve understanding and comprehension (Graham and Argyle, 1975;Riseborough, 1981;Hostetter, 2011;Kelly et al, 2015;Dargue et al, 2019), attention (Berger and Popelka, 1971), memory (Ianì and Bucciarelli, 2017;Clough and Duff, 2020), stimulate emotional reactions (Jackob et al, 2011), and clarify the discourse content (Holle and Gunter, 2007). According to the integrated system hypothesis (Kelly et al, 2010), gestures are part of an integrated system together with speech.…”
Section: Hand Gesturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the psychological interpretation of the obtained differences is not completely clear, we may cautiously suggest that the group with better clinical and functional outcome may engage some embodied cognition mechanisms in language production, such as a reliance on sensorimotor and visuospatial representations (Fogassi & Ferrari, 2007;. Another possible interpretation is an increased use of cospeech gestures by the more preserved patients that facilitates the planning and organization of utterances and lexical retrieval in the speaker as well as understanding in the listener (Clough & Duff, 2020). This is also supported by the data on impaired co-speech gestures in schizophrenia patients with severe negative symptoms and on the association between gesture performance and social functioning .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nonetheless, there remains a decisive issue in the aphasia therapy literature: whilst evidence supports the use of behavioral therapy to improve aphasia, the mechanisms of therapy that promote change remain unclear (Brady et al, 2016). The review by Rose et al (2013) emphasizes that gestures should be included in clinical assessments in aphasia, and a recent review by Clough & Duff (2020) further emphasizes that a potent means of better understanding the mechanisms of successful behavioral therapy is to comprehensively evaluate multimodal communication (i.e., gesture alongside written and spoken language) in persons with neurogenic communication disorders.…”
Section: Discussion 625mentioning
confidence: 99%