2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(02)00098-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of high positive friction (HPF) modifier in the control of short pitch corrugations and related phenomena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
90
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years industry focus has been on the separate control of friction at (a) the gauge face / flange interface (traditional lubrication) and (b) the top of rail (TOR) / wheel tread interface. The latter requires special materials known as friction modifiers that provide (a) a controlled intermediate coefficient of friction (average µ = 0.35 [4] as measured by a Salient Systems push tribometer) considered safe for braking and adhesion, and (b) a positive slope to the creepage / creep force curve beyond the point of creep saturation (referred to as positive friction) [5]. This paper describes modeling work aimed at better understanding the role and mechanisms of TOR friction control in reducing train energy requirements, and continues previous work presented in [6].…”
Section: Wheel / Rail Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years industry focus has been on the separate control of friction at (a) the gauge face / flange interface (traditional lubrication) and (b) the top of rail (TOR) / wheel tread interface. The latter requires special materials known as friction modifiers that provide (a) a controlled intermediate coefficient of friction (average µ = 0.35 [4] as measured by a Salient Systems push tribometer) considered safe for braking and adhesion, and (b) a positive slope to the creepage / creep force curve beyond the point of creep saturation (referred to as positive friction) [5]. This paper describes modeling work aimed at better understanding the role and mechanisms of TOR friction control in reducing train energy requirements, and continues previous work presented in [6].…”
Section: Wheel / Rail Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of HPF is mainly to reduce short pitch corrugation and squeal by introducing a positive slope after the saturation point on the creep curve as shown in Figure 29 [76]. The positive slope is introduced in order to avoid stick-slip oscillations.…”
Section: Measures To Improve Wheel-rail Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experimental quantities are fundamental for the validation both of the degraded To reach this goal and to effectively exploit the measured data, in this phase the wheelset is supposed to be placed in its centred position; in this way the position of the single contact point P c can be supposed to be known and nearly constant and the surface curvatures in the contact points, the semi-axes of the contact patch a, b and the contact shear stiffness C can be easily calculated [29]. Moreover the following simplified expressions for the sliding s sp j , for the creepage e sp j and for C hold: (20) in which J w = 160 kg m 2 is the wheel inertia. Subsequently Eq.…”
Section: The Tangential Contact Problem and The Degraded Adhesion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More particularly the analyses have been performed both on laboratory test rigs and through on-track railway tests by considering natural and artificial external contaminants and friction modifiers [7,8,16,18,20,24,36,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%