2010
DOI: 10.3758/app.72.2.427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of higher order image statistics in masking scene gist recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(167 reference statements)
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The P-S algorithm is designed to keep the second-order statistics such as the Fourier power spectrum along with the other P-S statistics (Loschky et al, 2010). Hence, the None condition is different from other conditions in terms of the power spectra.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The P-S algorithm is designed to keep the second-order statistics such as the Fourier power spectrum along with the other P-S statistics (Loschky et al, 2010). Hence, the None condition is different from other conditions in terms of the power spectra.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P-S statistics pooled from a single region (i.e., shape is not considered) successfully encode the information necessary for texture perception during a human behavioral task (Balas, 2006) and neuronal measurements (Freeman, Ziemba, Heeger, Simoncelli, & Movshon, 2013). Other research suggests the importance of these statistics in scene categorization (Loschky, Hansen, Sethi, & Pydimarri, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whereas this proved to be the case for shape-preserved targets, we observed a significant decrease in guidance to noise-seed targets. Although it is not yet known whether this limitation of a noise-seed will generalize to free viewing tasks and scenes (but see Loschky, Hansen, Sethi, & Pydimari, 2010), our finding should serve as a cautionary note to studies assuming information equivalence between unaltered stimuli and stimuli synthesized from a noise-seed (e.g., Rosenholtz, et al, 2012). It might also be the case that summary statistics are adequate for describing search guidance, and that the difference reported here between unaltered and noise-seed targets reflects instead a failure of the current synthesis method to fully capture these statistics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, more recent studies have suggested that conceptual masking may be less important than was previously thought (Loschky et al, 2010). Loschky et al found that when the interstimulus interval between the target image and the mask was 82 ms, a mask comprising natural scene textures was almost as effective at masking the identity of a target image of a natural scene as a mask comprising a second natural scene (i.e., a natural-scene mask).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Potter et al's (2014) use of natural scenes as masks was not without justification. Natural scenes had previously been used as masks in visual detection studies (Intraub, 1984;Potter, 1976) and been found to be the most effective masks in a study that compared four different mask types (natural scenes, scene textures, phase-randomized scenes, and white noise; Loschky, Hansen, Sethi, & Pydimarri, 2010). However, many of the natural scenes used by Potter et al (2014) contained extended areas where there were no high contrast edges (e.g., expanses of sky).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%