2018
DOI: 10.18194/ws.00110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of human compliance for management actions to protect breeding shorebirds in coastal ecosystems

Abstract: Located at the land-ocean interface, coastal ecosystems are highly vulnerable to human-mediated drivers of global change. For instance, coastal urbanization and the intense usage of beaches by humans can significantly influence life-history processes in coastal communities (Mead et al. 2013). Beaches have become large-scale recreational and tourism areas, mostly due to economic development and settlements along coastlines (Defeo et al. 2009, McLachlan et al. 2013, and since ecotourism activities have become mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple management actions toward the protection of beachnesting areas could have a direct conservation impact on breeding shorebirds. Symbolic fencing, for example, can restrict access to pedestrians and vehicles in specific beach areas, as a previous study case showed for TBPLs during the breeding season (Hevia and Bala 2018). From a conservation perspective, physiological assessments are a useful tool that benefits the decision making of wildlife managers (Coristine et al 2014, Madliger et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Simple management actions toward the protection of beachnesting areas could have a direct conservation impact on breeding shorebirds. Symbolic fencing, for example, can restrict access to pedestrians and vehicles in specific beach areas, as a previous study case showed for TBPLs during the breeding season (Hevia and Bala 2018). From a conservation perspective, physiological assessments are a useful tool that benefits the decision making of wildlife managers (Coristine et al 2014, Madliger et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%