2013
DOI: 10.13031/2013.42686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Hydrologic Alteration and Riparian Vegetation Dynamics in Channel Evolution along the Lower Minnesota River

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is developed for alluvial channels, which self-adjust their width, depth, and slope in response to the magnitude and frequency of geomorphically effective flows, changes in sediment supply and caliber relative to sediment transport capacity, and the efficiency of riparian vegetation to stabilize channel banks and floodplains within different climatic settings [Lane, 1955;Wolman and Gerson, 1978;Wolman and Miller, 1960;Yu and Wolman, 1987;Lenhart et al, 2013].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model is developed for alluvial channels, which self-adjust their width, depth, and slope in response to the magnitude and frequency of geomorphically effective flows, changes in sediment supply and caliber relative to sediment transport capacity, and the efficiency of riparian vegetation to stabilize channel banks and floodplains within different climatic settings [Lane, 1955;Wolman and Gerson, 1978;Wolman and Miller, 1960;Yu and Wolman, 1987;Lenhart et al, 2013].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rivers are incising through semi to wellconsolidated glacio-fluvial sediments and maintain continuous and relatively thick active layers of alluvium on the bed. Rapid erosion of stream banks and bluffs from channel adjustment within these two systems as a result of the recent shift in hydrology has led to an increase in sediment supplied downstream, which in turn has resulted in significant channel adjustment, floodplain aggradation, and water quality impairment Water Resources Research 10.1002/2016WR020277 on the main stem Minnesota River and further points downstream Markus, 2011;Lenhart et al, 2013].…”
Section: Empirical Analysis Of Hydrologic and Geomorphic Change In MImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lauer et al (2017) have reported that the Minnesota River and its major tributaries have been subject to widening at an average rate of 0.62% yr À1 (relative to the average width between 2000 and 2009) since the 1930s. Similarly, Lenhart et al (2013) reported that rapid widening of the main stem of the Minnesota River began later than 1966, which is after an extreme flood event of 1965 (Strub, 1965;Novotny and Stefan, 2007). Some studies have suggested that the major source of sediment has shifted from upland to near-channel, primarily due to this rapid channel widening (Belmont et al, 2011;Schottler et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An assessment of the impact of hydrological regime shift on bankfull channel change is another potential application of the model, because of its use of the flow duration curve. Many previous studies have reported or studied changes in the bankfull geometry of meandering streams triggered by increased stream flow (Bradley and Smith, 1984;Simon, 1989;Simon and Rinaldi, 2000;Phillips et al, 2005;Lenhart et al, 2013;Lauer et al, 2017). Moreover, the effectiveness of moderately high flows with higher recurrence (rather than extreme flows) on morphological work has been recognized in classical studies (e.g., Wolman and Miller, 1960;Benson and Thomas, 1966).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MRB drains approximately 43,400 km 2 of south-central Minnesota, South Dakota, and Iowa, USA ( Figure 1). The Minnesota River itself is disproportionately small (~100 m wide; Lauer et al, 2017) compared to its wide valley (up to 2 km wide; Lenhart et al, 2013) carved by outflows from glacial Lake Agassiz near the end of the last glaciation (Clayton & Moran, 1982;Matsch, 1983). Incision on the mainstem Minnesota River created knickpoints that have propagated upstream on all major tributaries, leading to deeply incised lower tributary valleys in an otherwise relatively flat postglacial landscape (Belmont, 2011;Gran et al, 2009Gran et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Mrb Environmental Observatorymentioning
confidence: 99%