1988
DOI: 10.1016/0167-9317(88)90015-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of implantation temperature and dose in the control of the microstructure of SIMOX structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ) had any effect on the resulting morphology of the samples, implantation was undertaken using both singly charged O + at 200 kV and singly charged molecular O + 2 at twice the acceleration potential (400 kV), giving the same overall beam energy. From the results obtained there was no discernible difference between the samples; this accords with earlier measurements on oxygen-implanted silicon [11].…”
Section: Effects Of Implantation Conditionssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 ) had any effect on the resulting morphology of the samples, implantation was undertaken using both singly charged O + at 200 kV and singly charged molecular O + 2 at twice the acceleration potential (400 kV), giving the same overall beam energy. From the results obtained there was no discernible difference between the samples; this accords with earlier measurements on oxygen-implanted silicon [11].…”
Section: Effects Of Implantation Conditionssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A series of samples (see table 1) were then implanted with a dose of 1.4 × 10 18 O + cm −2 ± 10% at 200 keV at temperatures ranging from ∼170-600 • C. This dose was chosen because previous extensive studies on oxygen-implanted silicon [11] had shown that this was the optimum dose on which to observe the effects of implantation temperature on the morphology of the implanted region. In the case of the present study implantation was carried out at temperatures of 600 • C, (OX15); 400 • C (OX16); 205 • C (OX17) and 170 • C (OX28); in the case of the former two samples a heated sample stage was used to heat the sample to the desired temperature, while The probe beam was 1.5 MeV He + , equating to 2.958 keV/channel.…”
Section: Effects Of Implantation Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dose above to 5.5_10 17 cm -2 , ribbon-like lamellae of silicon appears in this layer. The thickness of the fourth damage region near the bulk silicon interface is over 200nm, and this layer contains large defects lying along {311} silicon lattice planes but the oxygen concentration is low [4,5]. Compare to the annealed samples, this layer recovers to single silicon thoroughly after annealing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This dose was chosen because previous extensive studies on oxygen implanted silicon [8] had shown that this was the optimum dose on which to observe the effects of implantation temperature on the morphology of the implanted region. This dose was chosen because previous extensive studies on oxygen implanted silicon [8] had shown that this was the optimum dose on which to observe the effects of implantation temperature on the morphology of the implanted region.…”
Section: Low Energy Implant Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%