1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00348117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of insects in the dynamics of cone production of red pine

Abstract: The mortality of red pine cones was studied for several consecutive years using life tables in eight different stands in the northern Great Lakes States. Usually less than 20% of a cohort of female flowers survived to maturity. Insects were the main source of mortality and were primarily responsible for annual fluctuations in the abundance of mature cones. Insects were probably also responsible, along with late summer weather (especially precipitation), for influencing the rate of initiation and differentiatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All variables were arcsin-transformed prior to analyses. Both linear regression analyses were signi®cant (P << 0.05); n 24 in each analysis sults have been shown from other studies of an insect largely dependent on a single plant species as a food resource (Edland 1971(Edland , 1974Mattson 1978;Silvertown 1980;Dempster and Pollard 1981;Solbreck and Sille nTullberg 1986). Variation in fruit production was very important for the proportion of fruits attacked and seeds consumed.…”
Section: Fruiting Display and Predation Among Populationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…All variables were arcsin-transformed prior to analyses. Both linear regression analyses were signi®cant (P << 0.05); n 24 in each analysis sults have been shown from other studies of an insect largely dependent on a single plant species as a food resource (Edland 1971(Edland , 1974Mattson 1978;Silvertown 1980;Dempster and Pollard 1981;Solbreck and Sille nTullberg 1986). Variation in fruit production was very important for the proportion of fruits attacked and seeds consumed.…”
Section: Fruiting Display and Predation Among Populationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…1, the variance of log(TNS) equals the sum of the variances of the logtransformed independent variables plus twice the sum of their covariances, hence additivity is achieved and partitioning may be performed (see Mott 1966 for further details and justification on this method). A potential shortcoming of the logarithmic transformation, however, is that it will tend to cause a distortion of the original scale of measurement, and the degree of distortion will depend on the absolute values of original variables (Mattson 1978). The rescaling effected by the transformation will tend to underestimate the variance contributions of variables with comparatively large values on the original measurement scale, such as, in this case, number of inflorescences and number of flowers per inflorescence.…”
Section: Total Seed Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas genotypic variation in resistance to foliage-feeding insects on conifers has been reported (Wright et al 1975, Nielsen et al 2002, little is known about the genetic variation in resistance to cone-feeding insects on conifers. Mattson (1978) reports that genotype is an important factor in resistance to cone insects in pine. As of yet, we have no information on potential mechanisms of resistance of cone insects on Norway spruce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%