The Role of Islam in Indonesian Foreign Policy: A Case of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Introduction

Abstract

As Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono won the 2004 presidential election, it marked the end of Indonesia’s democratic transition era and experienced a dynamic change in foreign policy. The new international identity that viewed Islam as an asset was introduced by SBY, emphasizing the importance of moderate Islam as opposing extremism. The phenomenon of Islamic influence was not only the result of democratic consolidation domestically but also external factors such as the aftermath of 9/11 that portrayed Muslims as potential terrorists. For this reason, Indonesian foreign policy attempted to diminish such misconceptions and tried to be a peacemaker or a mediator in Muslim-related issues globally. To contextualize the analysis, the study focuses on the influence of Islam in Indonesian foreign policy towards the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and Pakistan. The mutual aspirations on the Palestinian statehood shared by both the government and the Muslim elements in society could be found, while religious sentiments were noticeable, as shown by the Muslim groups. In contrast, the influence of Islam in Indonesia-Pakistan relations, especially regarding the Kashmir dispute, was absent due to the difference in views of the government and the Muslim groups and constraining factors, including Indonesia’s national interest priority.

Perlawanan Diaspora Yahudi Sulawesi Utara Terhadap Antisemitisme Melalui Museum Holocaust Indonesia

“…Hal tersebut diterima oleh kelompok-kelompok terkait di Indonesia, di mana didukung pula oleh hubungan panjang antara negara-negara mayoritas Muslim di Asia Tenggara dan negara-negara di Timur Tengah (Setiawan, 2007). Israel sendiri tidak memiliki hubungan diplomatik dengan Indonesia (Alatas, 2020;Songbatumis, 2021). Meskipun begitu, diaspora Yahudi di Indonesia tetap menjalankan ajarannya meskipun dengan jumlah yang lebih sedikit dibandingkan dengan komunitas agama lainnya.…”

The role of Indonesian government in middle east conflict resolution: consistent diplomacy or strategic shifts?

“…According to Hicks (2021), "active" means that the country does not maintain a passive or reactive stand on international issues and instead obtains active participation in the settlement. This research assessed five major conflicts in the contemporary Middle East political scene, namely, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the Syrian upheaval, the Saudi-Yemen conflict, Egypt's transitional democracy, and the Iranian nuclear issue (Songbatumis, 2021). In each of these conflicts, Indonesia encountered various challenges and was often torn between taking a passive versus an active role (Winanti and Alvian, 2021).…”