2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of kink boundaries in the deformation and recrystallisation of polycrystalline ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subgrain boundaries and the pattern of misorientation angles are commonly interpreted as the result of dynamic recovery of dislocations generated during deformation and subsequent subgrain rotation related to ongoing recovery (Guillope and Poirier, 1979;Trimby et al, 1998;Fliervoet et al, 1999;Wheeler et al, 2001) and has been observed from ice deformation experiments previously and interpreted in this way (e.g. Montagnat et al, 2015;Qi et al, 2017;Seidemann at al., 2020). The misorientation angle at which neighbour-pair frequency has reduced to be equal to the random-pair frequency increases with decreasing temperature (Figs.…”
Section: Dislocation Activity Recovery Subgrain Rotation and Subgramentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The subgrain boundaries and the pattern of misorientation angles are commonly interpreted as the result of dynamic recovery of dislocations generated during deformation and subsequent subgrain rotation related to ongoing recovery (Guillope and Poirier, 1979;Trimby et al, 1998;Fliervoet et al, 1999;Wheeler et al, 2001) and has been observed from ice deformation experiments previously and interpreted in this way (e.g. Montagnat et al, 2015;Qi et al, 2017;Seidemann at al., 2020). The misorientation angle at which neighbour-pair frequency has reduced to be equal to the random-pair frequency increases with decreasing temperature (Figs.…”
Section: Dislocation Activity Recovery Subgrain Rotation and Subgramentioning
confidence: 91%
“…quartz (Cross et al, 2017a;Kilian and Heilbronner, 2017), olivine (Hansen et al, 2012), Magnox alloy (Wheeler et al, 2009) and zircon (MacDonald et al, 2013). The misorientation axes for subgrain boundaries are generally rotations around rational crystallographic axes, particularly directions in the basal plane, suggesting that the boundaries may represent arrays of dislocations (Humphreys and Hatherley, 2004;Shigematsu et al, 2006). There is much higher frequency of low-angle (Particularly < 10 • ) neighbour-pair misorientations than is expected from the CPO (as shown by the random-pair misorientation angles).…”
Section: Dislocation Activity Recovery Subgrain Rotation and Subgramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rotation axes of the analyzed samples, shown in Figure 8, can be classified into two types: one parallel to the c-axes that is activated at the depths of 50, 140, and 170 m, and another along the basal plane that has been highlighted at all depths except at 140 m. Assuming that only the basal slip system is active, rotation axes parallel to the c-axis can be related to twist walls (screw dislocations) of the basal slip system, while rotation axes along the basal plane can be related to tilt walls (edge dislocations) of the basal slip system. Statistically significant data sets from experiments identify both of these rotation axes [26,71] and subgrain boundary trace analyses, and weighted burgers vector analyses [72] of these same samples (Sheng Fan, personal communication) indicate that the rotation axes in basal plane are clearly related to basal plane dislocations. Other studies have constrained the operation of non-basal dislocations in both experimental [73,74] and natural [70,75] ice and further work is needed to determine the contribution of non-basal dislocations in these samples.…”
Section: Recrystallization Processes and Slip Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lamellae of clinopyroxene are common in orthopyroxene grains in harzburgites (Figure 4a) and lherzolites (Figure 4f). Bent clinopyroxene lamellae, corresponding to straight subgrain boundaries in the orthopyroxene, form a kink band-like geometry (the inset of Figures 4f and S1; Seidemann et al, 2020). Lamellae near subgrain boundaries are slightly thicker, branching of the subgrain boundary occurs close to the intersection with lamellae, and the bend in the clinopyroxene occurs across one or more subgrain boundaries (inset of Figure 4f).…”
Section: Microstructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%