2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.962875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Labor Market Intermittency in Explaining Gender Wage Differentials

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The continued existence of significant gender differences is disturbing not only from an equity perspective, but also for its potential impacts on economic growth and even fertility (Galor and Weil, 1996). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain why such gender inequities exist, with the weight of attention being paid to gender differences in human capital (Blau and Kahn, 2000), discrimination and stereotypes against women (Spencer et al, 1999;Goldin andRouse, 2000, Reuben et al, 2010), and differences in time taken out of the labor force (Phipps et al, 2001;Hotchkiss and Pitts, 2007). More recently, an experimental literature has emerged that reports another potential source for the observed gender imbalance: women shy away from competitive workplaces whereas men covet, and even thrive in, competitive environments (Gneezy et al, 2003;Niederle and Vesterlund, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The continued existence of significant gender differences is disturbing not only from an equity perspective, but also for its potential impacts on economic growth and even fertility (Galor and Weil, 1996). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain why such gender inequities exist, with the weight of attention being paid to gender differences in human capital (Blau and Kahn, 2000), discrimination and stereotypes against women (Spencer et al, 1999;Goldin andRouse, 2000, Reuben et al, 2010), and differences in time taken out of the labor force (Phipps et al, 2001;Hotchkiss and Pitts, 2007). More recently, an experimental literature has emerged that reports another potential source for the observed gender imbalance: women shy away from competitive workplaces whereas men covet, and even thrive in, competitive environments (Gneezy et al, 2003;Niederle and Vesterlund, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some research (Adserà 2004), career interruptions are particularly harmful in a context of continual high unemployment. For instance, Hotchkiss and Pitts (2007) have documented how frequent interruptions negatively influence job market outcomes. In addition, (re)entering the labor market in periods of high unemployment is associated with heavy, long-lasting penalties (for instance, see Oreopoulos et al (2012) for an analysis on college graduates).…”
Section: Theory and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two phenomena characterize a third condition is that economic segregation, whereby women are paid less than men (Rubery et al 2005). This so-called wage gap can also be explained as a result of intermittency women's employment during maternal leave (Hotchkiss and Pitts 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Economics Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%