2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of language in multi-dimensional categorization: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation and exposure to verbal labels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In subsequent work, we have confirmed earlier reports that this type of "low-dimensional" categorization is impaired in individuals with anomic aphasia (Lupyan & Mirman, 2013). In another test of the idea that verbal labels promote the formation of low-dimensional categories, Perry and Lupyan (2014) had participants learn simple visual categories of "minerals" (Gabor patches) defined by two dimensions: orientation (more vs. less steep) and spatial frequency (higher vs. lower contrast). The space of exemplars was set up so that participants could use a single dimension-either orientation or spatial frequency-or integrate both dimensions.…”
Section: Knowledge Through Language Versus Knowledge Through Perceptisupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In subsequent work, we have confirmed earlier reports that this type of "low-dimensional" categorization is impaired in individuals with anomic aphasia (Lupyan & Mirman, 2013). In another test of the idea that verbal labels promote the formation of low-dimensional categories, Perry and Lupyan (2014) had participants learn simple visual categories of "minerals" (Gabor patches) defined by two dimensions: orientation (more vs. less steep) and spatial frequency (higher vs. lower contrast). The space of exemplars was set up so that participants could use a single dimension-either orientation or spatial frequency-or integrate both dimensions.…”
Section: Knowledge Through Language Versus Knowledge Through Perceptisupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, some insight come from studies in which linguistic factors are experimentally manipulated while people attempt to learn new categories or use existing knowledge to recognize or make inferences about familiar categories. Below, we briefly review evidence that, under the influence of language, semantic knowledge may become more categorical with consequences for behavior ranging from basic perception to reasoning (see Lupyan, 2012Lupyan, , 2016Lupyan & Bergen, 2015;Perry & Lupyan, 2014 for more extended discussion.). To foreshadow: Language appears to promote abstraction.…”
Section: Knowledge Through Language Versus Knowledge Through Perceptimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wernicke's region, usually defined as the posterior part of the superior temporal cortex behind the primary auditory cortex (Geschwind, 1970;Perry and Lupyan, 2014;Price, 2000), is traditionally thought to be involved in the recognition of patterns of spoken language (Geschwind, 1970;Wernicke, 1874). However, discussions similar to those for Broca's region have been led on the exact function, location and even existence of Wernicke's region (e.g.…”
Section: Wernicke's Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binder et al, 1996;Bogen and Bogen, 1976;Dronkers et al, 2004;Turken and Dronkers, 2011;Wise et al, 2001). Recent studies have suggested that Wernicke's region plays a role in the mapping between visual and linguistic representations of categories (Perry and Lupyan, 2014) and indeed perhaps the most compelling argument in favor of the posterior temporal cortex being involved in linguistic processing is the location right between auditory and visual cortices (Geschwind, 1970), making it intuitively appealing to believe that it serves a function as an associative region for input that link the two perceptual modalities.…”
Section: Wernicke's Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Down-regulation of neural activity over Wernicke's area using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (as a means of inhibiting neural processing involved in naming (see e.g. Price, 2000)) tends to promote forming a more dense category structure (Perry & Lupyan, 2014). Taken together, evidence from studies of children, typical adults, and adults with aphasia, suggest that labelling supports the ability to represent sparse categories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%