2020
DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Severe and/or Necrotic Pancreatitis in the Setting of Modern Minimally Invasive Management of Pancreatic Necrosis

Abstract: Objectives The trend toward minimally invasive procedures (MIP) in necrotizing pancreatitis is increasing. The optimal timing and technique of cholecystectomy in severe/necrotizing pancreatitis is unclear. This study aims to determine the role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after severe/necrotizing pancreatitis in the context of MIP. Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospective database was performed for consecutive patients after cholecystectomy fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Fong et al 20 reported some reassuring data favoring EC performed during surgical necrosectomy in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, showing no significant differences in postoperative mortality, overall morbidity, or bile duct injury compared with the control group. Similarly, Ackerman et al 45 compared 56 patients with moderately severe or severe ABP with 299 patients with mild ABP and showed that laparoscopic cholecystectomy could be performed safely, irrespective of severity. However, Nealon et al 26 assessed 78 patients with moderately severe or severe ABP who underwent EC and 109 patients who underwent DC, finding a complication rate after cholecystectomy of 44% in the former vs 5.5% in the latter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fong et al 20 reported some reassuring data favoring EC performed during surgical necrosectomy in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, showing no significant differences in postoperative mortality, overall morbidity, or bile duct injury compared with the control group. Similarly, Ackerman et al 45 compared 56 patients with moderately severe or severe ABP with 299 patients with mild ABP and showed that laparoscopic cholecystectomy could be performed safely, irrespective of severity. However, Nealon et al 26 assessed 78 patients with moderately severe or severe ABP who underwent EC and 109 patients who underwent DC, finding a complication rate after cholecystectomy of 44% in the former vs 5.5% in the latter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients managed with operative transgastric necrosectomy, as described above, this is still a viable option. In patients managed with a step-up approach, there is a substantial risk of gallstone-related complications in the delay before cholecystectomy if it is deferred until resolution of necrosis, as high as 20% in recent studies . However, there is no evidence-based consensus on the optimal timing of cholecystectomy in step-up patients, and better evidence-based patient benchmarks are needed to determine this.…”
Section: Common Associated Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tend to proceed when the acute phase of inflammation and necessary debridement have been performed, the patient is nutritionally replete, and the period of critical illness has passed. Multiple series have now shown a laparoscopic approach to be feasible and safe in the vast majority of these patients . While often performed at tertiary care centers where these patients receive their NP care, there is no evidence that this is necessary.…”
Section: Common Associated Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Показания к применению инвазивных пособий установлены в 10 (21,7%) случаях (лапароскопическая санация и дренирование сальниковой сумки и брюшной полости -4, холецистостомия -6). Средний койко-день в ОАР составил 3,0 (2,0-5,0) суток, средний общий (с учетом повторной госпитализации для удаления дренажа) койкодень -14,5 (11,(0)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)9) суток (среди выписанных пациентов -14,0 (11,0-19,0) суток). Умерло 2 (4,3%) человека, рецидив ОПБЭ развился у 1 (55%).…”
Section: таблица 1 доклиническая характеристика сравниваемых групп (N...unclassified
“…Однако проблеме раннего оперативного лечения тяжелого ОПБЭ посвящены лишь единичные работы, что определяет ее актуальность [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. В настоящее время диагностика и лечение ОП регламентированы клиническим протоколом «Диагностика и лечение пациентов (взрослое население) с острым панкреатитом при оказании медицинской помощи в стационарных условиях» [17] и рядом клинических руководств и международных доказательных практических рекомендаций [1-3, 18, 19].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified