2017
DOI: 10.17129/botsci.812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of leaf traits and bird-mediated insect predation on patterns of herbivory in a semiarid environment in central Mexico

Abstract: Background: In arid environments plants face aridity and herbivory, therefore it has been proposed that both are convergent selective forces. However the drivers of insect herbivory in these ecosystems remain poorly understood. Question: Does insect herbivory vary in two plant associations subject to different levels of aridity? To what extent differences in herbivory are determined either by foliar traits, or predation by birds? Study species: Citharexylum tetramerum, Viguiera pinnatilobata, and Solanum tridy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a cross-biome comparison of bird consumption of arthropod prey reported 25-fold differences between Arctic tundra and tropical forests (Nyffeler et al 2018), whereas the study based on artificial caterpillars revealed no latitudinal trend in attack rates by birds (Roslin et al 2017). More rigorous experimental studies that simultaneously measure predator impacts on artificial and natural prey (e.g., , Ruiz-Guerra et al 2017 are badly needed to validate earlier work and to justify the further use of dummies in ecological and environmental research.…”
Section: Bird Predation Measured Using Artificial Caterpillars Vs Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, a cross-biome comparison of bird consumption of arthropod prey reported 25-fold differences between Arctic tundra and tropical forests (Nyffeler et al 2018), whereas the study based on artificial caterpillars revealed no latitudinal trend in attack rates by birds (Roslin et al 2017). More rigorous experimental studies that simultaneously measure predator impacts on artificial and natural prey (e.g., , Ruiz-Guerra et al 2017 are badly needed to validate earlier work and to justify the further use of dummies in ecological and environmental research.…”
Section: Bird Predation Measured Using Artificial Caterpillars Vs Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of birds in protecting forests from insect damage was proved scientifically about a century ago (reviewed by Bruns 1960;Inozemtsev 1978), and meta-analysis of controlled experiments has confirmed that birds generally reduce plant losses to insects (Mäntylä et al 2011). However, the intensity of bird predation on plant-feeding insects may differ between habitat types (Inozemtsev 1978;Garibaldi et al 2010;Ruiz-Guerra et al 2017), between sites (Connor et al 1999;Brewer and Gaston 2003), and between plant species within a site (Holmes and Robinson 1981;Giffard et al 2012;Singer et al 2012); as the result, the actual contribution of bird predation to the observed variation in insect herbivory at different scales remains unclear. Even more importantly, the data available so far do not allow for prediction of the sign of correlation between bird's predation and insect herbivory: not only does bird impact decrease abundance of plant-feeding insects (Mäntylä et al 2011), but low insect availability also decreases abundance of insectivorous birds (Martin 1987;Thiollay 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of florivory damage (Florivory Index, ) present in the male and female flowers was calculated using the same equation from the herbivory index of Dirzo and Domínguez [ 57 ] as follows: where X i is the florivory category (damage score, 0 to 5), n i is the number of flowers in the category X i evaluated, and N is the total number of flowers. The FI was then expressed as a percentage of florivory following the methodology proposed by Ruiz-Guerra et al [ 58 ], which is based on a cubic linear model with intercept set to zero: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X i is the florivory category (damage score, 0 to 5), n i is the number of flowers in the category X i evaluated, and N is the total number of flowers. The FI was then expressed as a percentage of florivory following the methodology proposed by Ruiz-Guerra et al [58], which is based on a cubic linear model with intercept set to zero:…”
Section: Characterization Of Florivorymentioning
confidence: 99%