2002
DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Leukocytes Following Cerebral Ischemia: Pathogenic Variable or Bystander Reaction to Emerging Infarct?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
122
2
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
3
122
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect may have resulted indirectly from a Slit-induced decrease in leukocyte chemotaxis and recruitment, and/or directly from a Slitinduced change in the neuronal response to ischemia. Although not a universal finding (Hayward et al, 1996;Emerich et al, 2002), considerable evidence supports the notion that adherent and infiltrating leukocytes contribute to ischemic damage following focal ischemia (see Jean et al, 1998 andWang et al, 2005 for reviews). In particular, the degree of leukocyte infiltration following focal stroke correlates with the severity of neuronal injury and neurological deficits in animals Clark et al, 1994;del Zoppo et al, 1991) and humans (Akopov et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect may have resulted indirectly from a Slit-induced decrease in leukocyte chemotaxis and recruitment, and/or directly from a Slitinduced change in the neuronal response to ischemia. Although not a universal finding (Hayward et al, 1996;Emerich et al, 2002), considerable evidence supports the notion that adherent and infiltrating leukocytes contribute to ischemic damage following focal ischemia (see Jean et al, 1998 andWang et al, 2005 for reviews). In particular, the degree of leukocyte infiltration following focal stroke correlates with the severity of neuronal injury and neurological deficits in animals Clark et al, 1994;del Zoppo et al, 1991) and humans (Akopov et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several interventions that directly or indirectly reduce inflammation improve outcome in the setting of global ischemia (Lee et al, 1999;Block et al, 2001;Ueda et al, 2005). On the other hand, leukocyte-directed therapies do not always provide benefit in global ischemia models (Aspey et al, 1989;Schott et al, 1989;Emerich et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is evidence against a detrimental role of neutrophils in the brain after acute stroke in that neutrophil depletion does not reduce infarct volume (Beray-Berthat et al, 2003;Harris et al, 2005;Yilmaz et al, 2006). Neutrophils instead seem to enter the brain because of damage rather than being a cause of it (Emerich et al, 2002), and this does not occur to a significant degree for at least 3 days after stroke (Gelderblom et al, 2009). We did detect a reduction in both circulating and splenic monocytes and neutrophils after I-R, although no gender difference Gender, reperfusion, Nox2, and T lymphocytes after stroke VH Brait et al was present (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 It is also remains controversial as to whether neutrophils contribute directly to secondary brain damage or are merely bystanders that mainly assist in promoting tissue repair and recovery. 11,12 Further, T lymphocytes are now understood to contribute to ischemic brain injury after reperfusion. 13,14 Thus, Rag1 À / À mice that are deficient in lymphocytes appear to be partially protected from severe histochemical and functional outcomes after cerebral ischemia and reperfusion due to the absence of T lymphocytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%