The role of liquidity in asset pricing: the special case of the Portuguese Stock Market

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this paper is to examine the role of liquidity in asset pricing in a tiny market, such as the Portuguese. The unique setting of the Lisbon Stock Exchange with regards to changes in classification from an emerging to a developed stock market, allows an original answer to whether changes in the development of the market affect the role of liquidity in asset pricing. Design/methodology/approach The authors propose and compare two alternative implications of liquidity in asset pricing: as a desirable characteristic of stocks and as a source of systematic risk. In contrast to prior research for major stock markets, they use the proportion of zero returns which is an appropriated measure of liquidity in tiny markets and propose the separated effects of illiquidity in a capital asset pricing model framework over the whole sample period as well as in two sub-samples, depending on the change in classification of the Portuguese market, from an emerging to a developed one. Findings The overall results of the study show that individual illiquidity affects Portuguese stock returns. However, in contrast to previous evidence from other markets, they show that the most traded stocks (hence the most liquid stocks) exhibit larger returns. In addition, they show that the illiquidity effects on stock returns were higher and more significant in the period from January 1988 to November 1997, during which the Portuguese stock market was still an emerging market. Research limitations/implications These findings are relevant for investors when they make their investment decisions and for market regulators because they reflect the need of improving the competitiveness of the Portuguese stock market. Additionally, these findings are a challenge for academics because they exhibit the need for providing alternative theories for tiny markets such as the Portuguese one. Practical implications The results have important implications for individual and institutional investors who can take into account the peculiar effect of liquidity in stock returns to make proper investment decision. Originality/value The Portuguese market provides a natural experimental area to analyse the role of liquidity in asset pricing, because it is a tiny market and during the period studied it changed from an emerging to a developed stock market. Moreover, the authors have to highlight that previous evidence almost exclusively focuses on the US and major European stock markets, whereas studies for the Portuguese one are scarce. In this context, the study provides an alternative methodological approach with results that differ from those theoretically expected. Thus, these findings are a challenge for academics and open a theoretical and a practical debate.

Testing the market efficiency in Indian stock market: evidence from Bombay Stock Exchange broad market indices

“…As we omitted 11 indices, future researchers can focus on those indices to see if the results from the study can be replicated. Second, future research can focus on liquidity's role in asset pricing in the stock market (Miralles-Quirós et al. , 2017) and see how liquidity affects the EMH in the Indian stock market.…”

Liquidity risk, transaction costs and financial closedness: lessons from the Iranian and Turkish stock markets

“…They concluded that local liquidity variables are an important factor to explain expected returns. Miralles-Quiros et al (2017) found evidence of liquidity risk impacting asset returns in Portugal from 1988 to 2013. This evidence was even stronger in the sampling time when Portugal was considered an emerging market.…”

Illiquidity Premium in the Indian Stock Market: An Empirical Study

“…The role of the market illiquidity premium factor was found to be significant and positively priced in the developed markets of US, Hong Kong, Australia and Spain (Chan & Faff, 2005;Keene & Peterson, 2007;Lam & Tam, 2011;Miralles, Quirós, & Miralles, 2004), while it is not significantly priced in the developed markets of Portugal and Norway (Leirvik, Fiskerstrand, & Fjellvikås, 2017;Miralles-Quiros, Miralles-Quiros, & Oliveira, 2017). Empirical studies on emerging markets in Vietnam, Taiwan, Croatia, Indonesia and Poland have found that the illiquidity premium factor is significant and positively priced (Amanda & Husodo, 2015;Chen, Tai, & Cho, 2019;Ganja, 2019;Hoang & Phan, 2019;Minović & Živković, 2014).…”