2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Low-dose Anti-thymocyte Globulin as Standard Prophylaxis in Mismatched and Matched Unrelated Hematopoietic Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post‐transplant cyclophosphamide (day +3,+4) along with cyclosporine plus MMF (day+5) was the standard GVHD prophylaxis in haploidentical transplants. Unrelated and haploidentical transplant recipients received ATG (5 mg/kg) as part of the conditioning, as previously described . Assessment and grading of aGVHD were performed according to criteria suggested by Glucksberg et al while cGVHD was assessed and graded according to Sullivan et al criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post‐transplant cyclophosphamide (day +3,+4) along with cyclosporine plus MMF (day+5) was the standard GVHD prophylaxis in haploidentical transplants. Unrelated and haploidentical transplant recipients received ATG (5 mg/kg) as part of the conditioning, as previously described . Assessment and grading of aGVHD were performed according to criteria suggested by Glucksberg et al while cGVHD was assessed and graded according to Sullivan et al criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (day +3, +4) along with cyclosporine plus MMF (day+5) was the standard GVHD prophylaxis in haploidentical transplants. Unrelated and haploidentical transplant recipients received ATG (5 mg/kg) as part of the conditioning, as previously described …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unrelated and haploidentical transplant recipients received ATG (5 mg/kg) as part of the conditioning, as previously described. 13 Assessment and grading of aGVHD was performed according to criteria suggested by Glucksberg et al, whereas cGVHD was assessed and graded according to the criteria by Sullivan et al 14,15 Site involvement was recorded in both aGVHD and cGVHD patients at diagnosis, pre-and post-ECP evaluation. In particular, for lung GVHD, patients were screened on day +100 with computed tomographic imaging and follow-up spirometry as part of our clinical practice.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively low-dose ATG is effective in acute GvHD prophylaxis, leading to promising survival rates in matched transplants [24]. Our results indicate that ATG is also effective, but connected to mixed chimerism in very early period after HSCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%