1986
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90753-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of lymphangiography in vulvar carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No satisfactory method to achieve this has been identified. Neither palpation of the groin nor lymphography is reliable 6, 7…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No satisfactory method to achieve this has been identified. Neither palpation of the groin nor lymphography is reliable 6, 7…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lymphography was performed for lymphatic metastasis in 295 patients with endometrial carcinoma and the results revealed that lymphography was positive in 8.9% of patients at Stage I, 28.6% at Stage II, 57.1% at Stage III, and 66.6% at Stage IV, with the coincidence rate with pathology reaching 86.3% [3]. In 1986, a retrospective study on 32 patients with urogenital tumors showed that the accuracy rate of LG was the highest, with a specificity of 83% in judging pelvic lymphatic metastasis [4]. Lang compared preoperative LG and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in 30 cases of ovarian cancer, and found that the correlation between lymphography and histological examinations was 83.3% [2].…”
Section: Clinical Significancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In 1985, Von Eschenbach et al concluded that gross lymph node metastases could be detected with a high degree of accuracy in selected genitourinary tumors using direct lymphangiography (20). A retrospective study in 1986 evaluated 32 patients diagnosed with genitourinary cancers (21). Accuracy rates were highest for pelvic nodes, 16 out of 21 being correctly diagnosed with a specificity of 83%, but overall it was concluded that a negative scan was more likely to be predictive of node status than a positive scan.…”
Section: Intra-lymphatic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%