2019
DOI: 10.1002/pmh.1461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of maladaptive personality domains across multiple levels of the HiTOP structure

Abstract: This study aimed to examine associations between maladaptive personality traits and psychopathology from the perspective of the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP). We tested hierarchical structural models to further validate a portion of the structural components of HiTOP. We also tested a priori personality and psychopathology associations with three levels of the HiTOP hierarchy: general psychopathology, spectra and syndromes/disorders. We used a large sample from the general Australian populat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
35
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
4
35
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our sample was not optimal for delineating the true psychopathology hierarchy in the general population (because of extreme group sampling), our results nevertheless indicate that the assumption of simple structure may be unrealistic. This notion is supported by the results of the present bassackwards analysis and also corroborate previous studies that showed deviations from the simple structure (e.g., Krueger et al, 2012;Sellbom et al, 2020). In the context of hierarchical personality assessment, it is assumed that many lower-level personality traits (i.e., facets which correspond to the symptom clusters in this case) are part of several higher order traits (e.g., circumplex models; Hofstee, et al, 1992;Johnson & Ostendorf, 1993).…”
Section: The Hierarchical Structure Of Psychopathologysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although our sample was not optimal for delineating the true psychopathology hierarchy in the general population (because of extreme group sampling), our results nevertheless indicate that the assumption of simple structure may be unrealistic. This notion is supported by the results of the present bassackwards analysis and also corroborate previous studies that showed deviations from the simple structure (e.g., Krueger et al, 2012;Sellbom et al, 2020). In the context of hierarchical personality assessment, it is assumed that many lower-level personality traits (i.e., facets which correspond to the symptom clusters in this case) are part of several higher order traits (e.g., circumplex models; Hofstee, et al, 1992;Johnson & Ostendorf, 1993).…”
Section: The Hierarchical Structure Of Psychopathologysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, ADHD symptoms usually present the lowest factor loadings in most studies (Lahey et al, 2017;Snyder et al, 2017), or even negative factor loadings in the externalizing factor when testing bi-factor models (Castellanos-Ryan et al, 2016). ADHD have also been associated with internalizing problems (Greenbaum & Dedrick, 1998;Sellbom, Carragher, Sunderland, Calear & Batterham, 2019), with some studies proposing them to be a separate factor from internalizing and externalizing (Achenbach, Dumenci, & Rescorla, 2001;Sánchez-Sánchez et al, 2016). These data generally suggest that the location of ADHD symptoms within the psychopathology structure needs further examination.…”
Section: Psychopathology Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Sellbom et al examine correlations among HiTOP dimensions—namely, internalizing, externalizing and thought disorder—and pathological trait domains represented in the DSM‐5 alternative model of personality disorder. They found that, in a representative sample of Australians, personality disorder domains had expected patterns of association with quantitative psychopathology dimensions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%