2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1809.07413
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Mesons in Muon g-2

Fred Jegerlehner

Abstract: The muon anomaly a µ = (g µ − 2)/2 showing a persisting 3 to 4 σ deviation between the SM prediction and the experiment is one of the most promising signals for physics beyond the SM. As is well known, the hadronic uncertainties are limiting the accuracy of the Standard Model prediction. Therefore a big effort is going on to improve the evaluations of hadronic effects in order to keep up with the 4fold improved precision expected from the new Fermilab measurement in the near future. A novel complementary type … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the issue of hadronic modeling is most severe in the hadronic light-by-light (HLbL) contribution, for which a data-driven dispersive approach has only been recently developed [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. 1 In contrast, the leading hadronic contribution, hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP), is, in principle, fully determined by the cross section for e + e − → hadrons [22,23], and indeed a combination of the analysis of exclusive channels, inclusive data, and perturbative-QCD constraints are used for current estimates of the HVP contribution [24][25][26][27]. 2 However, only the compilations from [24,25] are exclusively based on the direct integration of the data, while [26,27] do involve some model assumptions, in particular for the ω and φ contributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, the issue of hadronic modeling is most severe in the hadronic light-by-light (HLbL) contribution, for which a data-driven dispersive approach has only been recently developed [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. 1 In contrast, the leading hadronic contribution, hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP), is, in principle, fully determined by the cross section for e + e − → hadrons [22,23], and indeed a combination of the analysis of exclusive channels, inclusive data, and perturbative-QCD constraints are used for current estimates of the HVP contribution [24][25][26][27]. 2 However, only the compilations from [24,25] are exclusively based on the direct integration of the data, while [26,27] do involve some model assumptions, in particular for the ω and φ contributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In contrast, the leading hadronic contribution, hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP), is, in principle, fully determined by the cross section for e + e − → hadrons [22,23], and indeed a combination of the analysis of exclusive channels, inclusive data, and perturbative-QCD constraints are used for current estimates of the HVP contribution [24][25][26][27]. 2 However, only the compilations from [24,25] are exclusively based on the direct integration of the data, while [26,27] do involve some model assumptions, in particular for the ω and φ contributions. In general, tensions among data sets are typically taken into account by a local error inflation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%