2012
DOI: 10.1177/1094670512462138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Metaperception on the Effectiveness of Referral Reward Programs

Abstract: It is generally believed that referral reward programs (RRPs) work because recommendations from friends or relatives are perceived as impartial and trustworthy in analogy to what happens with word-of-mouth recommendations. To understand how an incentivized recommendation affects recommendation behavior, we conducted qualitative interviews and two experiments. We show that recommendation behavior is driven by the givers perception (i.e., their metaperception) of how they will be viewed by the receivers. Metaper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
129
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
10
129
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In a CRP environment, with the reward being the central element, reward salience is certainly given. This assumption is in line with Wirtz, Orsingher, Chew, and Tambyah () who state that incentivizing referrals even “changes the nature of the interpersonal communication” (p. 83) for the customer making the recommendation. Further, Yi and Jeon () find that customer responses increase with the perceived size of rewards in loyalty programs.…”
Section: Conceptual and Theoretical Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a CRP environment, with the reward being the central element, reward salience is certainly given. This assumption is in line with Wirtz, Orsingher, Chew, and Tambyah () who state that incentivizing referrals even “changes the nature of the interpersonal communication” (p. 83) for the customer making the recommendation. Further, Yi and Jeon () find that customer responses increase with the perceived size of rewards in loyalty programs.…”
Section: Conceptual and Theoretical Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The authors further assume that customer recommendation behavior is not only directly influenced by brand evaluation, but also by the perceived reward attractiveness. A more attractive reward, subsequently, is related to higher recommendation odds (e.g., Ryu & Feick, 2007;Wirtz et al, 2013) since more attractive stimuli unfold stronger attitudinal and behavioral reactions (Baker & Churchill, 1977;Berscheid & Walster, 1974). In this regard, researchers exploring the power of attractiveness generally acknowledge its effects on customer behavior to be highly relevant for marketers (e.g., Caballero, Solomon, & Dean, 1984).…”
Section: A Schema Congruity Theory Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, numerous scholars have explored referral programs using tie strength as a moderator (Ryu & Feick, 2007;Verlegh et al, 2013;Wirtz & Chew, 2002;Wirtz, Orsingher, Chew, & Tambyah, 2013). In our research we explored the use of another important moderator-product involvement.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These perspectives are different in the sense that learning from word-of-mouth is more indirect. Customers who learn from word-of-mouth must rely on experiences that they did not observe directly (Kuo et al, 2013;Wirtz et al, 2013). In other words, observational learning involves customers seeing another customer's experience with their own eyes.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, research indicates that customers learn about brands and services through word-of-mouth (Kuo et al, 2013;Wirtz et al, 2013). Researchers should compare the relative impacts of learning about service recovery through observation versus word-of-mouth on evaluations of a service provider.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%