2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-005-0699-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of MgO in the binding of SO2 by lime-containing materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During a 2-min contact, PF/BA bound 58%, while PF/ESPA1 and PF/CA only 33% of the total amount of bound sulphur dioxide. This data correspond to the data obtained in our earlier research (Kaljuvee et al [13,14]) and can be explained by the differences in chemical and fractional composition as well as in physical and chemical properties of the ashes. Thus, CFBC/BA and CFBC/INT have coarser fractional composition and lower SSA level, but higher free CaO content, while CFBC/ESPA has fine fractional composition (and high level of SSA), but low content of free CaO (see Table 1 In the experiments of SO 2 -binding MgO, free CaO and, partially, Ca-silicates can take part in the reactions with SO 2 .…”
Section: Transformations In the Gas-solid System So 2 -Ashsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During a 2-min contact, PF/BA bound 58%, while PF/ESPA1 and PF/CA only 33% of the total amount of bound sulphur dioxide. This data correspond to the data obtained in our earlier research (Kaljuvee et al [13,14]) and can be explained by the differences in chemical and fractional composition as well as in physical and chemical properties of the ashes. Thus, CFBC/BA and CFBC/INT have coarser fractional composition and lower SSA level, but higher free CaO content, while CFBC/ESPA has fine fractional composition (and high level of SSA), but low content of free CaO (see Table 1 In the experiments of SO 2 -binding MgO, free CaO and, partially, Ca-silicates can take part in the reactions with SO 2 .…”
Section: Transformations In the Gas-solid System So 2 -Ashsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although MgO does not take part in CO 2 binding under these conditions [13], it has a certain role in SO 2 binding (Kaljuvee et al [13,14]). Hence, the negative influence of coarser fractional composition of the samples and, correspondingly, the lower level of specific surface area (SSA) in the case of, for example, CFBC/BA (mean particle size 197 µm; SSA 2.1 m 2 /g) and CFBC/INT (95 µm; 2.6 m 2 /g) should be compensated by higher level of free CaO content -11.9 and 18.9%, respectively (see Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was due to a specific grain structure for the calcined material, which means a larger pore surface area for sulfur retention (Martin, 1981;Watanabe et al, 1993;Zhang et al, 1992, in: Santana et al, 1998. However, by comparing limestones of different chemical compositions, it is not easy to understand why apparently contradictory results are found in the literature, i.e., sometimes a dolomite is better than a calcitic limestone, and sometimes the opposite was found (Montagnaro et al, 2002;Kaljuvee et al, 2005;Laursen et al, 2000). This is also more complicated when comparing data obtained from dynamic and static experimental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Depending on the experimental conditions and/or limestone origin, the efficiency of desulfurization may change. It is possible to find experimental results in which calcitic and dolomitic limestones change places as being indicated as the best sorbent (Montagnaro, 2010;Kaljuvee, 2005;Laursen, 2000;De Diego, 2013a). A dolomite showed superior performance as sorbent for CO2 capture in a postcombustion system due to higher MgO resistance to sintering that stabilizes CaO structure (Valverde, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%