2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00548.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Mobile Computed Tomography in Mass Fatality Incidents

Abstract: Mobile multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scanners are potentially available to temporary mortuaries and can be operational within 20 min of arrival. We describe, to our knowledge, the first use of mobile MDCT for a mass fatality incident. A mobile MDCT scanner attended the disaster mortuary after a five vehicle road traffic incident. Five out of six bodies were successfully imaged by MDCT in c. 15 min per body. Subsequent full radiological analysis took c. 1 h per case. The results were compared to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A full review of images for medico-legal reasons may take up to 1 h [16]. Also a suitably qualified radiologist, with post-mortem experience who is prepared to undertake subsequent criminal court work may not be available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A full review of images for medico-legal reasons may take up to 1 h [16]. Also a suitably qualified radiologist, with post-mortem experience who is prepared to undertake subsequent criminal court work may not be available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Each disaster is different and the approach adapted accordingly. The final identification results depend mainly on the presence and quality of the AM information (physical evidence such as X-rays elements (Goodman & Edelson, 2002;Messmer, 1982;Rutty et al, 2007), fingerprints if possible 5 , dental records (De Valck, 2006;Kieser et al, 2006;Poisson et al, 2003) and of course DNA (Gill, 2006). In 2006 Perrier mentioned -when referring to the Phuket identifications -the effectiveness of the following methods: 73% of identification by odontology, 24% by dactyloscopy and 3% by DNA analysis (Perrier et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussion -Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then the use of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging has been widely reported within the forensic and radiological literature [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Despite the advances in this field, a significant obstacle to the acceptance of so-called near virtual autopsies relates to the diagnosis of cardiac death and the failure of standard post-mortem imaging to yield detailed information concerning the coronary arteries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%