2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-011-9329-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of morphological awareness in reading achievement among young Chinese-speaking English language learners: a longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the scarce amount of L2 studies, another limitation of previous studies is that, similar to L1 research, L2 studies have usually tracked young learners or adolescents rather than adults (Cho & Tong, 2014;Jeon, 2011;Koda, 2000;Lam et al, 2012;Zhang & Koda, 2012). A few studies have dealt with L2 adult learners in passage-level reading.…”
Section: Morphological Awareness In L1 and L2 Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the scarce amount of L2 studies, another limitation of previous studies is that, similar to L1 research, L2 studies have usually tracked young learners or adolescents rather than adults (Cho & Tong, 2014;Jeon, 2011;Koda, 2000;Lam et al, 2012;Zhang & Koda, 2012). A few studies have dealt with L2 adult learners in passage-level reading.…”
Section: Morphological Awareness In L1 and L2 Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relations between L2 morphological awareness, L2 vocabulary knowledge, and L2 reading have also been researched (Jeon, 2011;Kieffer & Lesaux, 2012;Lam et al, 2012;Qian, 1999). The influence of L2 morphological awareness on L2 vocabulary knowledge or L2 reading comprehension has been of main interest.…”
Section: Morphological Awareness In L1 and L2 Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a statistically significant, unique effect of morphological decoding fluency, however, should not be interpreted to mean that this process is unfunctional in English reading comprehension in Chinese EL2 readers. After all, previous findings on young Chinese-speaking ESL readers in English-speaking societies, such as the United States and Canada, have highlighted the importance of morphology (e.g., Lam, Chen, Geva, Luo, & Li, 2012;Wang, Cheng, & Chen, 2006). Developmentally, it might be the case that Chinese L2 readers in a bilingual context like Singapore, in contrast to their counterparts in a mainstream Englishspeaking society such as the United States, may show a delayed emergence of active derivational morphological processes in reading.…”
Section: Influence Of Differential Target-language Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there is little evidence as to whether morphological awareness assessed in one language is associated with gains in reading comprehension in that same language for bilinguals. Studies of bilingual students have shown relations at a single timepoint between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in English (e.g., Goodwin et al, 2015;Jeon, 2011;Kieffer & Lesaux, 2008Lam, Chen, Geva, Luo, & Li, 2012;Lipka & Siegel, 2012;Wang, Ko, & Choi, 2009). Although studies of monolingual English-speaking students have indicated that morphological awareness determines gains in reading comprehension over time (Deacon, Kieffer, & Laroche, 2014;Deacon & Kirby, 2004;Foorman, Petscher, & Bishop, 2012;Kruk & Bergman, 2013), there have been few such tests in bilinguals.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence To Datementioning
confidence: 99%