The role of motorized transport and mobile phones in the diffusion of agricultural information in Tanggamus Regency, Indonesia

Abstract

Limited access to agricultural information constrains the well-being of farmers in developing countries and leads to environmental deterioration. Although new information-communication technologies (ICTs) are expected to alleviate this problem, the importance of physical mobility is rarely considered. This study explores the roles of motorized transport and mobile phones in the diffusion of agricultural information within and between Indonesian farming communities. In 2012, we surveyed 315 household heads from 16 coffee and cocoa farming groups in Sumatra. The respondents identified 1575 sources from which they obtained agricultural information, the exact location of the sources, and the mode of contact. In 2013, we followed up with in-depth interviews of 20 farmers to obtain a qualitative description of their agricultural information-seeking behavior. Although 75 % of respondents had a mobile phone, the main mode of information sharing was face-to-face meetings for 97 % of the elicited relationships. Mobile phones were used to communicate with people living at the edge of the regular physical mobility radius enabled by motorbikes (approximately 10 km). A hierarchical logit model was applied to examine the implications of the respondents' tendency to use motorized transport vis-à-vis walking for information gathering. Respondents with a higher general preference for faster transport tended to have more extensive access to information from other communities. However, we also find weak evidence that individual motorized transport might decrease internal social contact and information exchange inside these communities. The policy implication for rural development in less-industrialized countries is that providing ICTs without increasing the inhabitants' mobility through appropriate means may not significantly improve the inhabitants' access to important information and the diffusion of successful agricultural practices.

Tapping the full potential of the digital revolution for agricultural extension: an emerging innovation agenda

“…Not all roles may require access to a personal mobile phone or digital literacy in order to benefit from the service. It is also clear, however, that digital extension applications will not replace classical face-to-face advisory in the foreseeable future, and will, therefore, need to fulfil complementary functions (Matous et al, 2015). The most marginalized farmers, such as illiterate women, are often excluded from agricultural advisory services, but also tend to have limited access to digital media.…”

Social interactions in transportation: analyzing groups and spatial networks

“…The study by Matous et al (2015) centers on information diffusion in personal networks. Based on data of rural Indonesian coffee and cacao farmers, the authors investigate how agricultural information is obtained.…”

“…This helps addressing some of the otherwise difficult to solve issues and turns out to be a successful cross-fertilization of two sub-disciplines of econometrics. Matous et al (2015) complement their quantitative analysis of a multilevel multivariate logistic model with qualitative data from classical semi-structured interviews from social science for a nuanced assessment of the impact of policies. Dubernet and Axhausen (2015) draw on co-evolutionary principles from natural computing to develop an algorithm to efficiently search approximate solutions for their framework for joint decision making, which in turn is inspired by game theory.…”

Market Participation Variables in Commercializing South African Smallholder Farmers

“…The needs of smallholder farmers and their developmental perspectives have continued to gain prominence, rising to the forefront of the political, economic and research agenda in many developing countries (United Nations, 2012), and centred primarily on smallholdersector commercialisation and modernisation for stimulating economic growth and enhancing food security (Martey et al, 2014). However, the difficulties encountered by smallholders in market participation have been well documented (Badiane 2014), and costs related to obtaining market information, including a lack of reliable information on markets are identified as impeding factors to smallholder commercialisation (Matous et al, 2015;Milovanovic, 2014).…”