2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1rp90035h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of multiple representations in the understanding of ideal gas problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
24
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…By supporting the formation of multiple different-level representations for any given problem these tasks also enhance problem-solving skills in general (Gabel et al, 1987;Bodner and Domin, 2000;Madden et al, 2011;Hernöndez et al, 2014). They were designed to probe and develop understanding at the second through fourth cognitive processing categories and first through third knowledge categories on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy.…”
Section: Effective Exercise Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By supporting the formation of multiple different-level representations for any given problem these tasks also enhance problem-solving skills in general (Gabel et al, 1987;Bodner and Domin, 2000;Madden et al, 2011;Hernöndez et al, 2014). They were designed to probe and develop understanding at the second through fourth cognitive processing categories and first through third knowledge categories on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy.…”
Section: Effective Exercise Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(k2c4) (This ex-tempore exercise is based on the articles by and Madden et al (2011). Pay special attention to the relative sizes of the forces.…”
Section: A Course Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markic & Eilks, 2008) and dishonesty (e.g. Stains & Talanquer, 2007;Stieff, 2011), difficulties in understanding (Grove & Bretz, 2010;Wood, Ebenezer, & Boone, 2013), and representation competency (Madden, Jones, & Rahm, 2011). Another area, which was commonly researched on among the studies reviewed were cognitive variables, making up about onequarter of the papers in this category.…”
Section: Number Of Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En consecuencia, un aspecto importante de la enseñanza de las ciencias debería ser promover en los alumnos las capacidades y valores necesarios para la tarea de modelizar (Harrison, & Treagust, 2000;Justi, & Gilbert, 2002;Izquierdo, & Adúriz-Bravo, 2005;Chamizo, 2010;Camacho et al 2012), dado que las mismas pueden ser desarrolladas mediante el proceso de enseñanza (Bamberger, & Davis, 2013;Halloun, 2007;Prins et al, 2009;Madden, Jones, & Rahm, 2011;Schwarz, 2002;Schwarz, & White, 2005). En este sentido, la competencia de modelización en el alumnado podría emerger como consecuencia de la participación activa de los estudiantes en prácticas de modelización y del consiguiente análisis reflexivo promovido tanto desde un punto de vista metacognitivo como desde una perspectiva de metamodelización acerca la naturaleza y utilidad de los modelos (Nicolaou, & Constantinou, 2014;Treagust, Chittleborough, & Mamiala, 2004).…”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified
“…En su lugar, se ha preferido manejar una valoración única de conjunto que marque el desempeño predominante en cada caso. Para ello se recurrió a rúbricas de cuatro niveles, siguiendo procedimientos similares a los adoptados o sugeridos por otros autores en estudios de otra naturaleza (Kozma, & Rusell, 2005;Madden, Jones, & Rahm, 2011;Nicolaou, & Constantinou, 2014;Schwarz et al, 2009): Nivel I: no se evidencia la capacidad a lo largo de la secuencia didáctica; ello se manifiesta en desempeños generalizados tipo C o, simplemente, la ausencia de evidencia alguna.…”
Section: Figura 4 Transposición Al Pensamiento Analógico De Las Dimunclassified