The role of network bridging organisations in compensation payments for agri-environmental services under the EU Common Agricultural Policy

Abstract

Compensation payments to farmers for the provision of agri-environmental services are a well-established policy scheme under the EU Common Agricultural Policy. However, in spite of the success in most EU countries in the uptake of the programme by farmers, the impact of the scheme on the long term commitment of farmers to change their practices remains poorly documented. To explore this issue, this paper presents the results of structured field interviews and a quantitative survey in the Walloon Region of Belgium. The main finding of this study is that farmers who have periodic contacts with network bridging organisations that foster cooperation and social learning in the agri-environmental landscapes show a higher commitment to change. This effect is observed both for farmers with high and low concern for biodiversity depletion. Support for network bridging organisations is foreseen under the EU Leader programme and the EU regulation 1306/2013, which could open-up interesting opportunities for enhancing the effectiveness of the current payment scheme for agri-environmental services.

What makes you a ‘hero’ for nature? Socio-psychological profiling of leaders committed to nature and biodiversity protection across seven EU countries

“…For example, Fielding, McDonald, and Louis (2008) have integrated TPB with identity variables, and found that, beyond positive attitude, normative support, and a stronger sense of the self as an environmental activist, also a greater involvement in environmental groups increases intention to engage in environmental activism. Similarly, Dedeurwaerdere, Polard, and Melindi-Ghidi (2015) have shown that a greater involvement in nature protection organizations improves behavioural change in favour of biodiversity amongst farmers. Botetzagias and van Schuur (2012) have investigated activism in green political parties among 12 European countries, including identity and macro-level variables, and found that both membership in environmental organizations and contextual factors (such as the quality of the country's natural environment and environmental policies) significantly influenced activism.…”

The Role of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices: Can Geographical Context and Time Explain the Differences Emerging from Literature?

“…Farmer's participation in social and/or environmental organisations: Regardless of the analysed geographical context, this factor-as a proxy of farmers' willingness to network-acts as a catalyst for the adoption of EFFPs by farmers [14,133,143,157] thanks to the social support they receive. However, in AS, this occurs only when farmers are men [127].…”

Using environmental knowledge brokers to promote deep green agri-environment measures

“…An empirical analysis of the emergence of networks of knowledge brokers was first undertaken by Dedeurwaerdere et al (2015). Using a series of structured in-depth field interviews with farmers adhering to certain agri-environment schemes, they found that farmers involved in knowledge coproduction and social learning processes organised by non-profit bridging organisations showed a strong improvement both in adoption of environmental practices and in adhesion to deep green (farther-reaching) AEMs.…”