2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of neurotensin in positive reinforcement in the rat central nucleus of amygdala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this result is consistent with experimental data indicating that the CeA plays an important role in reward-related processes and appetitive motivation, including acquisition and expression of conditioned place preference (Kertes et al, 2009;László et al, 2010;Rezayof et al, 2011). Moreover, it has been shown that lesions of the CeA result in an impaired memory for magnitude of food reinforcement (Kesner et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, this result is consistent with experimental data indicating that the CeA plays an important role in reward-related processes and appetitive motivation, including acquisition and expression of conditioned place preference (Kertes et al, 2009;László et al, 2010;Rezayof et al, 2011). Moreover, it has been shown that lesions of the CeA result in an impaired memory for magnitude of food reinforcement (Kesner et al, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…3A). Because the CeA has previously been implicated in the appetitive learning, including place preference training in the IntelliCages (Knapska et al, 2006(Knapska et al, , 2007, we next investigated whether MMP-9 activity could be detected in the CeA and then increased in mice subjected to the place preference learning. MMP-9 activity was previously found at the postsynaptic domains of excitatory synapses in the hippocampus (Wilczynski et al, 2008).…”
Section: Figure 2 Appetitively But Not Aversively Motivated Discrimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the concentration of SR48692 (NTSR1 antagonist) was in the range of fmol (10 fmol–1000 fmol). Because SR 48692 has an agonistic effect at high doses [55], [56], we used a low concentration of SR48692 compared to PD149163, which was also comparable to the dose range used by others for intracerebral injections [29], [51], [57], [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%