The role of non-nation-state actors and side events in the international climate negotiations

Schroeder, Heike; Lovell, Heather

doi:10.1080/14693062.2011.579328

Cited by 147 publications

(82 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We decided to target COP participants with relatively high familiarity of nonstate actor activities, for which side events provide a good venue (Lovell 2007;Buhr and Hjerpe 2012;Schroeder and Lovell 2012). Since our respondents are relatively actively involved in international policy making on climate change, they possess valuable insights on the governance activities of a range of non-state actors.…”

Section: Data and Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 Growing numbers of non-state actors participate in different steering activities, such as witnessed in the climate change area (Abbott 2012;Bulkeley et al 2012;Nasiritousi and Linnér 2014;Schroeder and Lovell 2012). With the international climate change negotiations continuing to deliver inadequate commitments by states (UNEP 2013), non-state actors are expected to play a more pronounced role (Andonova et al 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: understanding agency through governance profiles

Nasiritousi

Hjerpe

Linnér

2014

Int Environ Agreements

154

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Globalization processes have rendered non-state actors an integral part of global governance. The body of literature that has examined non-state actor involvement in global governance has focused mainly on whether and how non-state actors can influence states. Less attention has been paid to the comparative advantages of non-state actors to answer questions about agency across categories of non-state actors, and more precisely what governance activities non-state actors are perceived to fulfil. Using unique survey material from two climate change conferences, we propose that different categories of nonstate actors have distinct governance profiles. We further suggest that the different governance profiles are derived from particular power sources and that agency is a function of these profiles. The study thereby contributes to a strand in the literature focusing on the authority of non-state actors in climate governance and broadens the methodological toolkit for studying the ''governors'' of global governance.

show abstract

Section: Data and Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: understanding agency through governance profiles

Nasiritousi

Hjerpe

Linnér

2014

Int Environ Agreements

154

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Selain itu, sejumlah pelaku baru memasuki ranah REDD+ dan mendapatkan kekuasaan dan pengaruh yang baru dalam pengambilan keputusan (Schroeder dan Lovell 2011). Akibatnya, mereka dapat menggunakan lembaga mereka untuk mengubah perwakilan politis atas kepentingan tertentu dan dapat memperbaiki ketidakseimbangan informasi yang ada.…”

Section: Sejumlah Pelaku Dan Koalisi Baruunclassified

Menganalisis REDD+: Sejumlah tantangan dan pilihan

Angelsen¹,

Brockhaus²,

W.D.³

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…All COP-participants have met criteria for admittance [42] and, thus, they can be perceived as important stakeholders to the international climate negotiations. COPs have proven to constitute an excellent empirical setting to pursue research on climate governance [24][25][26]37,40,45,46].…”

Section: Methods and Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Climate Change Politics through a Global Pledge-and-Review Regime: Positions among Negotiators and Stakeholders

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pledge-and-review is an essential pillar for climate change mitigation up until 2020 under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. In this paper, we build on a survey handed out to participants at the Seventeenth Conference of Parties in 2011 to examine to what extent climate negotiators and stakeholders agree with existing critiques towards pledge-and-review. Among the critique examined, we find that the one most agreed with is that the pledges fall short of meeting the 2 degree target, while the one least agreed with is that pledges are voluntary. We also find that respondents from Annex 1 parties are more critical than respondents from Non-Annex 1 parties. Negotiators display strikingly similar responses regardless of where they are from, while there is a remarkable difference between Annex 1 and Non-Annex 1 environmental non-governmental organizations. We build on these results to discuss the legitimacy of pledge-and-review.

show abstract

The role of non-nation-state actors and side events in the international climate negotiations

Cited by 147 publications

References 27 publications

The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: understanding agency through governance profiles

The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: understanding agency through governance profiles

Menganalisis REDD+: Sejumlah tantangan dan pilihan

Climate Change Politics through a Global Pledge-and-Review Regime: Positions among Negotiators and Stakeholders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About