2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01164.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Nonenhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Early Assessment of Acute Pancreatitis

Abstract: NEMRI is comparable to CECT in the early assessment of the severity of AP, and both methods are equally efficient in predicting local and systemic complications of AP. MRI has a potential advantage over CT in detecting bile duct lithiasis and pancreatic hemorrhage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…MRI for acute pancreatitis clinical outcome [12,25] . Moreover, there is an additional and inevitable problem that infection cannot be excluded in areas of gland necrosis (mentioned below).…”
Section: Pancreatic Necrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MRI for acute pancreatitis clinical outcome [12,25] . Moreover, there is an additional and inevitable problem that infection cannot be excluded in areas of gland necrosis (mentioned below).…”
Section: Pancreatic Necrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages for using MRI in patients with acute pancreatitis are as follows: (1) it is a diagnostic imaging method without radiation hazard; (2) it is particularly useful in patients who cannot receive iodinated contrast material owing to allergic reactions or other contraindications; (3) MRCP has the unique capability of providing noninvasive images of pancreatic parenchyma and pancreatic duct integrity, and it has the advantage of demonstrating possible communication of a pancreatic pseudocyst with pancreatic ducts [8,15] ; (4) MRI has a potential advantage over CT in detecting bile duct lithiasis and pancreatic hemorrhage of pseudocysts or pseudoaneurysm, which can help plan surgery; (5) nonenhanced MRI seems to be more accurate and reliable for the early assessment of severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis than is contrast-enhanced CT [12,16,17] ; and (6) non-enhanced MRI is superior to CT for depiction and confirmation of mild forms of acute pancreatitis [18] . Nevertheless, there are several limitations for using MRI in this disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12] Modified Atlanta classification is a relatively objective index to evaluate both local and systemic changes in the development and progression of the disease. [13] There are multiple scoring systems available to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis. Ranson and APACHE II scores are usually used to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis in most institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the composition of soft tissue, MRI can produce morphologic images with a very high resolution in AP. [22][23][24] The imaging agent we aim to use is gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic (Gd-DTPA), a beneficial positive contrast agent with a long history of use in MRI examination of AP. 25,26 Liposomes are promising nanomedicines for targeted drug delivery and imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%