2021
DOI: 10.17816/clinutr96169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of nutritional support in the physical and functional recovery of critically ill patients: a narrative review

Abstract: There is ongoing debate about the role of nutrition during critical illness in terms of long-term outcomes. Even taking into account the inability to adequately assess all biological mechanisms associated with nutrition, it should be recognized that the available randomized trials, nutritional support during the early phase of critical illness, when considered in isolation from other treatment, may have very limited long-term functional value. This review focuses on recent clinical studies and evaluating the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[42][43][44][45] Early initiation of enteral nutrition is encouraged to support maintenance of gut integrity, modulation of the stress and immune response and attenuation of disease severity, which may, in turn, improve overall outcome, especially related to short term motor weakness and long term physical recovery. 34 An encouraging finding from this survey was the average time to initiation of enteral nutrition was <36 hours from time of ICU admission, consistent with current guidelines, and similar to times previously reported for the entire cohort in this survey. 15 Despite starting enteral nutrition early, the most common initial order was to start at a low rate and slowly increase to goal rate over a period 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[42][43][44][45] Early initiation of enteral nutrition is encouraged to support maintenance of gut integrity, modulation of the stress and immune response and attenuation of disease severity, which may, in turn, improve overall outcome, especially related to short term motor weakness and long term physical recovery. 34 An encouraging finding from this survey was the average time to initiation of enteral nutrition was <36 hours from time of ICU admission, consistent with current guidelines, and similar to times previously reported for the entire cohort in this survey. 15 Despite starting enteral nutrition early, the most common initial order was to start at a low rate and slowly increase to goal rate over a period 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…33 Focusing on physical recovery is likely the most pertinent endpoint to determine the efficacy of nutritional therapies, especially those targeting protein intake. 34 Physical activity after SAH is underreported, though there is data to indicate that long term impaired physical recovery is common, directly relates to muscle weakness, contributes to persistent fatigue and has a significant impact on overall outcome. [35][36][37][38][39] Inadequate protein intake, resulting in protein energy catabolism, has a direct impact on muscle health and subsequent physical recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not unsurprising given that this is a novel disease and little has been known about the disease progression and impact on nutritional status until recently. Additionally, a similar research gap relating to nutritional interventions in general ICU survivors has previously been identified [24].…”
Section: Nutrition Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Nevertheless, Toledo et al demonstrated similar findings in a younger population (mean age of 63) [21]. Finally, functional and health-related quality of life measures would be one of the most relevant outcomes in nutrition studies, but usually are secondary outcomes in large randomized controlled trials [30]. We do not have this information in our database, but we acknowledge the importance of this outcome for future studies in critical care nutrition, since like our study the other published validation cohorts of NUTRIC Score applied mortality as the primary outcome.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 93%