2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-021-10133-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Online Misinformation and Fake News in Ideological Polarization: Barriers, Catalysts, and Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study builds on the theoretical knowledge in literature by making significant contribution to the understanding of the impact of FN and SM platforms on the society. According to studies (Abouzeid et al, 2021 ; Au et al, 2021 ; Dwivedi et al, 2018 ; Kim et al, 2019 ; Parra et al, 2021 ; Tran et al, 2021 ) with combined body of knowledge on misinformation, FN, SM, SM platforms, cascading of FN, and risks of misinformation, this study identifies three main themes in our contribution: FN, SM, and societal acceptance. Previous studies (Orso et al, 2020 ; Pennycook et al, 2020 ) have presented FN and SM concepts, however this study’s introduction of societal acceptance is a novel theoretical contribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This study builds on the theoretical knowledge in literature by making significant contribution to the understanding of the impact of FN and SM platforms on the society. According to studies (Abouzeid et al, 2021 ; Au et al, 2021 ; Dwivedi et al, 2018 ; Kim et al, 2019 ; Parra et al, 2021 ; Tran et al, 2021 ) with combined body of knowledge on misinformation, FN, SM, SM platforms, cascading of FN, and risks of misinformation, this study identifies three main themes in our contribution: FN, SM, and societal acceptance. Previous studies (Orso et al, 2020 ; Pennycook et al, 2020 ) have presented FN and SM concepts, however this study’s introduction of societal acceptance is a novel theoretical contribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In communication, polarization follows a similar pattern: the system has no middle ranges, it moves between extremes. Different political and institutional crises have been preceded by an increasing polarization in political communication that continues during the critical event ( McCoy et al, 2018 ; Nguyen, 2018 ; Berman, 2019 ; Au et al, 2021 ). In environmental research, topics such as climate change or global warming are highly controversial in social media communication between believers and disbelievers or between different governments ( Pearce et al, 2014 ; Dahal et al, 2019 ; Tyagi et al, 2020 ; Al-Rawi et al, 2021 ; Sonnett, 2021 ) −this can also be a source for identifying correlations between the patterns of flickering in communication and environmental data.…”
Section: Discussion: Communicating On Social-ecological Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, their sources and authors could be suspect. The motivations for creating and disseminating fake news and product knowledge hiding can be political or financial, and the dissemination of fake news and product knowledge hiding can be facilitated by a lack of trust in traditional media, audiences misled by misinformation/fake news, and various CMC (computer-mediated communication) technologies ( Au et al, 2021 ). Researchers have been exploring several approaches to dealing with the effect of false information from both a technical and legal standpoint.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%