2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2008.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of optimal threats in auction design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for instance by Rubinstein (1982) or Sobel and Takahashi (1983). Auctions have been studied by Vickrey (1961); Klemperer (1999); Jehiel and Moldovanu (2000); Figueroa and Skreta (2009) among others, and used more recently by Montes et al (2018) and by Bounie et al (2018) for the sale of consumer information.…”
Section: Selling Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for instance by Rubinstein (1982) or Sobel and Takahashi (1983). Auctions have been studied by Vickrey (1961); Klemperer (1999); Jehiel and Moldovanu (2000); Figueroa and Skreta (2009) among others, and used more recently by Montes et al (2018) and by Bounie et al (2018) for the sale of consumer information.…”
Section: Selling Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The countervailing incentives to misreport are consequently not present in their model either, rendering their optimal mechanisms always deterministic. Figueroa and Skreta (2009a) and Brocas (2007) analyze optimal auctions with (negative) externalities. Figueroa and Skreta (2009b) study auction design with both positive and negative externalities in a very general setting to identify interesting classes of problems that are solvable via Myerson-like techniques.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of the optimal auction depend in part on the seller's powers to compel potential buyers to participate in the auction. See, e.g., Jehiel and Stacchetti (), Brocas (), and Figueroa and Skreta ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%