1997
DOI: 10.2307/3666211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of outside Directors in Bank Acquisitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
82
2
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
82
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on the relation between bank board size and performance suggests a significant relation (Zemzem, and Kacem, 2014). Many studies argue that large boards have positive effect on bank performance e.g., Subrahmanyam et al (1997), Andres and Vallelado (2008), and Belkhir (2009), and banking firms have larger boards than its non-bank counterparts (Booth et al, 2002). Adams and Mehran (2005) report an average board size of 18 directors (Note 1).…”
Section: Board Structure and Bank Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the relation between bank board size and performance suggests a significant relation (Zemzem, and Kacem, 2014). Many studies argue that large boards have positive effect on bank performance e.g., Subrahmanyam et al (1997), Andres and Vallelado (2008), and Belkhir (2009), and banking firms have larger boards than its non-bank counterparts (Booth et al, 2002). Adams and Mehran (2005) report an average board size of 18 directors (Note 1).…”
Section: Board Structure and Bank Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with Hermalin and Weisbach (1988), we restrict our analysis primarily to nonregulated industries since boards of directors for regulatory firms may be systematically different from boards of directors of non-regulatory firms (e.g., Baysinger and Zardkoohi, 1986;Subhramanyam et al, 1997). Therefore, we eliminate all financial institutions, insurance companies, and real estate firms defined as SIC codes 6000-6799.…”
Section: Sample Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitherto, several perspectives on wealth effects following takeovers have been studied in finance literature, thereby addressing specific issues such as method of payment (Franks et al 1988;Travlos 1987), identity of target (Chang 1998), methodology (Asquith et al 1983), firm size (Moeller et al 2004), and the impact of sector-specific characteristics (Allen and Sirmans 1987;Subrahmanyam and Rangan 1997).…”
Section: Shareholder Wealth Effects Following Takeoversmentioning
confidence: 99%