2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.02.036
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of oxytocin in implicit personal space regulation: An fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To sum up, the novelty of our findings is that the physiological response elicited by proximity to another person may play a crucial role on how we regulate the distance between ourselves and others during social interaction. This is an interesting point that highlights how autonomic response, which we often fail to detect consciously 41 , 42 , may nevertheless influence interpersonal space boundary 4 , 15 , 43 , thus offering a new perspective on the implicit component of social proximity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…To sum up, the novelty of our findings is that the physiological response elicited by proximity to another person may play a crucial role on how we regulate the distance between ourselves and others during social interaction. This is an interesting point that highlights how autonomic response, which we often fail to detect consciously 41 , 42 , may nevertheless influence interpersonal space boundary 4 , 15 , 43 , thus offering a new perspective on the implicit component of social proximity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Importantly, the goal of our two previous reports was to focus on main and interaction effects, whereas the present analyses focus specifically on main effects across all tasks. In the present study we also present results from four previously unreported tasks that examined the main effects of OT or AVP on: 3) deception detection (as in Israel et al, 2014;Pfundmair et al, 2017), 4) perceptions of trustworthiness or threat based on interpersonal distance (similar to outcomes studied in Cohen et al, 2018;Perry et al, 2015;Scheele et al, 2012), 5) a hypothetical bystander intervention, and 6) written reflections on a supportive interaction or a conflict with a close other (see Supplemental Materials for the background rationale of each task). It is important to note that our study began before the conceptually similar studies cited above were published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Most of the included studies were of "good" quality rating. 12 of the articles received a score of 7-9 stars and were rated as "good" [40][41][42][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52], while the other 5 articles received a score of 5-6 stars and were rated as "fair" [18,[53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of Each Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table 1, 11 studies were conducted with healthy individuals [18,40,41,45,[47][48][49][50]52,54,56] and 6 were with participants who had psychiatric disorders [42,44,46,51,53,55]. 696 subjects (47.6% males, 52.4% females) took part in the IPD experiments while recording the neural activities.…”
Section: Basic Information Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%