2006
DOI: 10.1126/science.1121726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Pair Dispersion in Turbulent Flow

Abstract: Mixing and transport in turbulent flows, relevant in a huge variety of both natural and industrial systems including chemical reactors, combustion engines, warm clouds, and biological odor detection, depend strongly on local concentration fluctuations. Local concentration in turn is intimately tied to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

18
194
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
18
194
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The original formula proposed by Richardson (1926), D 2 (t) = Ctt\ where C = 0(1) is a constant and f is the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate, is found to be consistent with Kolmogorov's (1941) energy-cascade law for three-dimensional (3D), homogeneous, isotropic turbulence in the inertial range, E(k) ~ e 2/3 Jt _5/5 (Batchelor, 1952). Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms responsible for Richardson's (1926) relation and the range of conditions under which it is valid remains the subject of some debate even in idealized experimental and numerical settings (e.g., Bourgoin et al, 2006). The direct applicability to oceanic flows, which tend to be two-dimensional (2D) under the effects of rotation and stratification (Cushman-Roisin, 1995) and which are often dominated by persistent inhomogeneity and anisotropy, is open to question.…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original formula proposed by Richardson (1926), D 2 (t) = Ctt\ where C = 0(1) is a constant and f is the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate, is found to be consistent with Kolmogorov's (1941) energy-cascade law for three-dimensional (3D), homogeneous, isotropic turbulence in the inertial range, E(k) ~ e 2/3 Jt _5/5 (Batchelor, 1952). Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms responsible for Richardson's (1926) relation and the range of conditions under which it is valid remains the subject of some debate even in idealized experimental and numerical settings (e.g., Bourgoin et al, 2006). The direct applicability to oceanic flows, which tend to be two-dimensional (2D) under the effects of rotation and stratification (Cushman-Roisin, 1995) and which are often dominated by persistent inhomogeneity and anisotropy, is open to question.…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Bourgoin et al (2006) obtained Batchelor (1952) scaling (similar to ballistic) in 3D homogeneous turbulence in the laboratory, but could not confirm the Richardson regime. Numerical simulations of 2D homogeneous turbulence Bracco ct al., 2004) yielded both the exponential and Richardson regimes.…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding was again questioned, though, in Ref. 15. Generally, experiments, both numerical and real, are still limited to flows with low Reynolds numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Kinematic simulations ͑KS͒ of turbulent-like flows [7][8][9] offers the possibility to study a number of dispersion aspects, also at high Reynolds numbers. Only recently [10][11][12][13][14][15] has it become possible to study the second moment of the probability density function ͑PDF͒ of the separation r͑t͒ between two particles also in real turbulence via direct numerical simulation ͑DNS͒ or experiment, with the notable exception of Bourgoin et al 15 at typically low to intermediate Reynolds numbers. Relative dispersion of fluid particles still serves as a benchmark problem for our current understanding of turbulence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation