“…These have either been concentrated in STEM domains (Conley, 2012; Lazarides et al, 2016a, 2018, 2019; Andersen and Chen, 2016; Chittum and Jones, 2017; Linnenbrink-Garcia et al, 2018; Perez et al, 2019), assessed at a domain-general level (Roeser et al, 1999; Tuominen-Soini et al, 2011, 2012), or across multiple domains (Viljaranta et al, 2009; Chow and Salmela-Aro, 2011; Chow et al, 2012; Lazarides et al, 2016b; Guo et al, 2018). A number of studies exist which compare motivations across domains using aggregate task values (combining component positive values into a single score) but exclude expectancy or cost measures (Viljaranta et al, 2009; Chow and Salmela-Aro, 2011; Chow et al, 2012; Guo et al, 2018); while others include aggregate values plus self-concept (Lazarides et al, 2016b). Emergent profiles from this body of work characterise relative valuing across subjects (e.g., mathematics and physical science versus English; Chow et al, 2012).…”