2018
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1458284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of path-dependence in the resilience of EU regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides infrastructure, public investment in education and R&D can also be used as a fiscal policy tool for improving regional resilience. Increased public spending on skill development improves the quality of existing human capital endowments resulting in the technological advancement of production and the creation of products and services of increased quality (Petrakos & Psycharis 2016;Tsiapa et al 2018;Panori & Psycharis 2019). It also creates an attractive environment for highly skilled persons to stay or migrate to the region (Giannakis & Bruggeman 2017;Kitsos & Bishop 2018).…”
Section: Fiscal Policy and Regional Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides infrastructure, public investment in education and R&D can also be used as a fiscal policy tool for improving regional resilience. Increased public spending on skill development improves the quality of existing human capital endowments resulting in the technological advancement of production and the creation of products and services of increased quality (Petrakos & Psycharis 2016;Tsiapa et al 2018;Panori & Psycharis 2019). It also creates an attractive environment for highly skilled persons to stay or migrate to the region (Giannakis & Bruggeman 2017;Kitsos & Bishop 2018).…”
Section: Fiscal Policy and Regional Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schreyogg and Sydow proposed the implementation of RIP along with the driving mechanism formed by existing technological lock-ins [17]. Tsiapa et al explained the positive effect of policy and economic factors on RIP during economic recovery by analyzing enterprise technological lock-in during the economic crisis of European Union (EU) [12]. The above research on the market timing of RIP and its influencing factors under the timing context has focused mainly on the institutional and economic factors and the timing of market technological lock-in (i.e., policy system, organizational management, external investment, etc.).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, by being limited to certain static methods (e.g., case analysis, Bayesian decision-making method, Malmquist productivity index, data envelope analysis (DEA), etc. [12][13][14][15]), the research on the impact mechanism of the factors affecting RIP has ignored the non-linearity and high uncertainty of RIP [16]. The existing research on RIP has also mainly analyzed the factors affecting the institutional economy, whereas the technological factors and the impact mechanism, influencing factors, and dynamic evolution of RIP have been largely ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the measurement attempts, we first recall Martin et al (2016) who, based on Martin (2012), operationalize employment recoverability and resistance. While the latter indicator is often employed in literature (see, e.g., Giannakis and Bruggeman 2019; Ezcurra and Rios 2019); however, another widely used indicator of employment resilience is simply the postcrisis employment growth rate (see, among others, Fingleton, Garretsen, and Martin 2012; Tsiapa, Kallioras, and Tzeremes 2018). Bristow and Healy (2018), on the other hand, adopt an evolutionary approach to annual employment data for the period 2001–2011 to verify the relationship between the technological innovation and the reorientation and renewal dimensions of resilience among the EU regions by treating each region as a separate time series to date the individual regional business cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migration is a positive driver of regional resilience in urban areas, while agriculture contributes positively in intermediate regions. Tsiapa, Kallioras, and Tzeremes (2018) demonstrate that sectoral productivity improvements are key drivers of employment growth, while Ezcurra and Rios (2019) demonstrate that regional institutional quality is a fundamental factor for resilience. Fratesi and Rodríguez-Pose (2016), investigating regional employment trends since the outbreak of the crisis, find that, with some exception, regions that had developed more sheltered economies during the boom years have not weathered the employment shock associated with the crisis well and vice versa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%