2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
138
2
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
8
138
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Osgood, Wilson, O'Malley, Bachman, & Johnston, (1996) have argued that informal socializing with peers can increase the risk of offending. Accordingly, the presence of peers makes delinquent acts more easy, fun and rewarding, while the absence of authority figures reduces the opportunity for social control responses to delinquency (Hoeben, Meldrum, & Young, 2016). This is consistent with empirical findings that show a negative relationship between structured activities and antisocial behavior (Mahoney & Stattin, 2000), as well as pro-social effects of structured "after school" activities in girls (Hansen, Larson, & Dworkin, 2003).…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Osgood, Wilson, O'Malley, Bachman, & Johnston, (1996) have argued that informal socializing with peers can increase the risk of offending. Accordingly, the presence of peers makes delinquent acts more easy, fun and rewarding, while the absence of authority figures reduces the opportunity for social control responses to delinquency (Hoeben, Meldrum, & Young, 2016). This is consistent with empirical findings that show a negative relationship between structured activities and antisocial behavior (Mahoney & Stattin, 2000), as well as pro-social effects of structured "after school" activities in girls (Hansen, Larson, & Dworkin, 2003).…”
Section: Implications and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In support of social learning theory, adolescents whose friends and romantic partners use alcohol increase their own alcohol use over time, relative to adolescents whose peers do not use alcohol (Cheadle, Walsemann, & Goosby, ; Leung, Toumbourou, & Hemphill, ; Osgood et al., ). In support of social ecological explanations of alcohol use, unstructured socializing with friends predicts alcohol use (Hoeben, Meldrum, & Young, ; Sun & Longazel, ).…”
Section: Transmission Of Alcohol Use In Friendship Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection effect explains why adolescents who engage in more risky behaviors are prospectively more likely to affiliate with deviant peers. The influence, or socialization, effect refers to the process by which adolescents follow the lead of their friends; that is, they are more likely to engage in risky behaviors when affiliating with deviant friends (Hoeben, Meldrum, & Young, 2016). This influence of peers emerges even after controlling for selection effects and adolescents' own previous risky behaviors (Maxwell, 2002;Reitz, Dekovi c, Meijer, & Engels, 2006).…”
Section: Deviant Peers and Risky Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%