The role of physician engagement on the impact of the hospital‐based practice improvement module (PIM)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians play an important role in hospital quality improvement (QI) activities. The Hospital‐Based Practice Improvement Module (Hospital PIM) is a web‐based assessment tool designed by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) to facilitate physician involvement in QI as a part of maintaining certification. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to explore the impact of the Hospital PIM on physicians participating in hospital‐based QI. DESIGN: Qualitative design consisting of semistructured telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: A purposeful sample of 21 early‐completers of the Hospital PIM. MEASUREMENTS: Grounded‐theory analysis was used to analyze transcripts of the semistructured telephone interviews. RESULTS: Physician completers of the Hospital PIM describe the impact in a variety of ways, including new learning about QI principles and activities, added value to their practice, and enhanced QI experience. An emerging theme was the mediating role of physician engagement in relation to the overall impact of the Hospital PIM. Four case studies illustrate these findings. Facilitators and barriers that influence the overall experience of the PIM are described. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of completing the Hospital PIM is mediated by the degree of physician engagement with the QI process. Physicians who become engaged with the Hospital PIM and QI process may be more likely to report successful experiences in implementing QI activities in hospital settings than those who do not become engaged. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2009;4:466–470. © 2009 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Validity and usefulness of members reports of implementation progress in a quality improvement initiative: findings from the Team Check-up Tool (TCT)

“…TCT measures evaluated in this study included participation in intervention components, perceptions of unit performance on infection prevention behavior, and key barriers to team progress including lack of leadership support and physician engagement, which are often central to implementation success [6,19-21]. Our study found support for the temporal stability, construct validity, and responsiveness of QI team member reports on intervention activities, perceived unit-level behaviors, and barriers to team progress from this instrument.…”

The Influence of Context on Quality Improvement Success in Health Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature

“…For example, through additional capital investments, an organization could easily modify such aspects of organizational infrastructure as information systems (e.g., data infrastructure) and general QI infrastructure (e.g., quality steering council or QI department). Similarly, there are many potential ways of increasing physicians’ involvement in QI, like aligning payment incentives and tying participation in QI to maintenance of board certification (Caverzagie et al 2009). If future research continues to support the ideas that the number of years an organization is involved in QI and the depth with which QI pervades the organization are important to QI success, it will be critical for organizations to continue the long‐term pursuit of QI across changes in leadership, economic climate, and policy.…”

Specialty Board Certification in the United States: Issues and Evidence

“…[31][32][33][34][35][36] Physicians describe having improved their ability to answer questions at the point-of-care, professionalism and teamwork behaviors, supervision of residents' clinical care, and general knowledge of quality improvement through MOC activities. [37][38][39][40][41] Although quality improvement is important to patient care, not all physicians understand how to apply the principles. Some studies note that practice-level collaboration and coaching may enhance the MOC practice improvement requirement.…”